tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post5495653830397060056..comments2024-03-29T00:36:23.577-07:00Comments on Owning Your Shit: Transcript of my Talk at Simon Fraser Universitygirlwriteswhathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01589256798123593486noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-25832527349187742832023-12-15T05:59:50.341-08:002023-12-15T05:59:50.341-08:00It is very useful for us.sex crime attorney||truck...It is very useful for us.<a href="https://srislawyer.com/sex-crimes-defense-in-virginia-fairfax" rel="nofollow">sex crime attorney</a>||<a href="https://srislawyer.com/trucking-accident-law-firms" rel="nofollow">trucking accident law firm</a>.SarahLillianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04627764934865597848noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-9119276058925541762023-11-21T00:56:30.292-08:002023-11-21T00:56:30.292-08:00Your talk at Simon Fraser University on "Toxi...Your talk at Simon Fraser University on "Toxic Masculinity and Toxic Femininity" was a thought-provoking exploration of gender norms and their impact on societal dynamics. It promoted open dialogue, critical reflection, and challenged stereotypes. The clarity of your message and audience engagement made it a memorable and impactful discussion on breaking free from harmful gender expectations. <a href="https://srislaw.com/abogado-de-conduccion-imprudente-condado-de-essex/" rel="nofollow">Abogado de Conducción Imprudente Condado de Essex</a>abigailunahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13188813775613589374noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-62446993372701079482021-05-23T04:26:08.015-07:002021-05-23T04:26:08.015-07:00google 1691
google 1692
google 1693
google 1694
go...<a href="http://seotechnology.in/story.php?title=%EC%B9%B4%EC%A7%80%EB%85%B8%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94" rel="nofollow">google 1691</a><br /><a href="https://justbookmark.win/story.php?title=%EC%8A%A4%ED%8F%AC%EC%B8%A0%EB%B0%B0%ED%8C%85%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94#discuss" rel="nofollow">google 1692</a><br /><a href="https://techdirt.stream/story.php?title=%EC%98%A8%EB%9D%BC%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%AC%EB%A1%AF%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94#discuss" rel="nofollow">google 1693</a><br /><a href="https://easybookmark.win/story.php?title=%EB%B0%94%EC%B9%B4%EB%9D%BC%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94#discuss" rel="nofollow">google 1694</a><br /><a href="https://weheardit.stream/story.php?title=%EC%98%A8%EB%9D%BC%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%AC%EB%A1%AF%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94#discuss" rel="nofollow">google 1695</a><br /><a href="https://timepost.info/story.php?title=%EC%98%A8%EB%9D%BC%EC%9D%B8%EC%8A%AC%EB%A1%AF%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%82%B0%EC%97%85%EC%9D%98-%EC%A4%91%EC%9A%94%ED%95%9C-%EB%B3%80%ED%99%94" rel="nofollow">google 1696</a>adminhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13328975220076167046noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-78206147765302957742020-10-05T01:37:27.134-07:002020-10-05T01:37:27.134-07:00This Is Really Useful And Nices Information. เทคน...<br /> This Is Really Useful And Nices Information. <a href="http://ufa365s.mystrikingly.com/blog/sa" rel="nofollow">เทคนิคบาคาร่า</a><br />This are such great articles. <a href="https://lucabet98.cabanova.com/14.html" rel="nofollow">เทคนิคบาคาร่า</a> This articles can help you to make some new ideas.<br /><a href="https://ufa888football.blogspot.com/2020/10/sa.html" rel="nofollow">https://soccersurfer98.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/09/02/132139?_ga=2.193217001.552343305.1598844608-1286484823.1596077192</a> I appreciate for reading my blogs.<br />UFA888https://www.blogger.com/profile/02148735920354450465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-35996217169835177472017-06-19T19:22:17.676-07:002017-06-19T19:22:17.676-07:00Thanks Karen I needed that. I am autistic and on d...Thanks Karen I needed that. I am autistic and on disability.<br /><a href="http://www.gtzmn.com" rel="nofollow">gclub</a><br /><a href="https://www.gclub-casino.com" rel="nofollow">gclub casino online</a><br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16117016437619093322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-91964719573536502492017-03-26T15:40:57.229-07:002017-03-26T15:40:57.229-07:00Maybe that sort of change would cure the curse of ...Maybe that sort of change would cure the curse of the "Scottish Play."Windy Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01951254236693386401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-19939729242479874062016-03-10T15:36:05.091-08:002016-03-10T15:36:05.091-08:00Traditional marriage, with a strictly gendered div...Traditional marriage, with a strictly gendered division of labor is less advantageous now that we're living in an industrial, largely urban society. Marriage is a social institution, it changes with time, and it continues to change. I think economic pressures, marriage equality, both the World Wars, and industrialization, have done as much to alter marriage as feminism. Marriage is more optional than it ever has been. AmyJanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03848313871185214909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-37325581392820628882016-02-18T21:03:37.789-08:002016-02-18T21:03:37.789-08:00You're right to say that a culture of traditio...You're right to say that a culture of traditional marriage requires trust. Trust between men and women that the other will behave honorably. Feminists have been working to undermine that trust ever since they first started taking power. After each trust eroding attack, they find new problems, which they conveniently blame on the old order to use as an excuse for new attacks. bookstopperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01362200021837334797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-85050981031456801482016-01-29T21:35:41.699-08:002016-01-29T21:35:41.699-08:00PS... I meant that men in US territories don't...PS... I meant that men in US territories don't pay federal taxes, hence can't vote in federal elections... yet can they can be drafted. That doesn't sound like a good deal. That's a worse deal than women paying taxes, not voting and not going to war years ago. ;-) Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-47639432314221019742016-01-29T21:22:43.959-08:002016-01-29T21:22:43.959-08:00This is an aside to your wonderful transcript and ...This is an aside to your wonderful transcript and because you mentioned rich women in the US wanting the vote...<br />No taxation without representation was an issue in the United States. Rich single women owned property and had to pay state and local taxes without being able to vote. The United States separated and fought England over the right to have representation since people were taxed. The Stanford Law Review has a different version on why women were granted the right to vote by the early 20th century and how they got there. In the end, it was due to a combination of federal income taxes and many women working in factories who had to pay taxes that were needed to pay for war. In the early 20th century you had women who were doctors, rich women who owned property and everyday women working in factories... all paying taxes. The numbers got to be too large to ignore. I guess one could argue and say that women didn't go to war, and if they had to work to survive, tax their income anyway while not letting them have any say in war? I'm not sure to be honest. US territories do not pay federal tax, but the men can and have been drafted into war. People in Washington DC pay federal taxes and have no real representation that can vote on anything in Congress. I think the Stanford interpretation and research into why women were given the vote in the US, showcases the US problem with... no taxation without representation. Rich women started it, because it went against everything the US believes in. I thought you might find it interesting Karen. Perhaps you can do an article on single women years ago paying taxes without representation and men in territories being drafted who do not pay federal income taxes. Might be interesting. I always read in MGTOW comments... take the vote away from women. Should we then have to pay taxes without representation? Another aside... For the last 20 years in the US, white women have voted majority for Republicans. Black men have voted majority for Democrats. I also find comments odd that say, take away women's votes, because women vote liberal? Well, which women? Here is the link to the Stanford Law Review. I find this all fascinating and I'm not sure what the answer to all of this could or should be.<br />http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/sites/default/files/articles/Tutt.pdfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-89156485613184375762016-01-15T14:27:04.983-08:002016-01-15T14:27:04.983-08:00*ahem* I think I might have been the first of us t...*ahem* I think I might have been the first of us to use the term hyperagency, but I will admit the idea germinated from her writings (in particular, a Genderratic blog post called "inflatablefem", so there you go. <br /><br />I used "perceptions of male hyeragency" in a video, then a MGTOW who goes by Stardusk made a video about female "hypoagency" and I made a video about my thoughts on that, and now the hyper/hypo agency dyad is fairly widely discussed in some circles.girlwriteswhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01589256798123593486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-79255530468598655552016-01-15T14:07:10.864-08:002016-01-15T14:07:10.864-08:00"The dehumanization of a population through p..."The dehumanization of a population through propaganda (such as Nazi dehumanization of Jews, or the KKK's dehumanization of blacks) had more to do with their actions or potential actions (agency) rather than seeing them as objects within an agent/object dichotomy. "<br /><br />The term Alison uses is "hyperagency". It is a cultural construct to justify a threat narrative and the threat narrative is a construct to justify whatever violence is necessary to keep the "threat" population in its place, whatever that may be. The parallel with the threat narrative in the US around black people is a good illustration.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07187836541591828806noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-26939016823620246852016-01-11T01:28:23.369-08:002016-01-11T01:28:23.369-08:00http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059848
That&...http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059848<br /><br />That's the abstract. I read the full study, and it looks good. <br /><br />The hypothesis presented here also dovetails with real life situations (such as the photos from Abu Ghraib or the camera direction in porn). <br /><br />In fact, it also dovetails with Alison's work on threat narratives. The dehumanization of a population through propaganda (such as Nazi dehumanization of Jews, or the KKK's dehumanization of blacks) had more to do with their actions or potential actions (agency) rather than seeing them as objects within an agent/object dichotomy. <br /><br />In fact, it seems that it is through viewing an individual as an agent (their personhood defined solely by their actions, potential actions, or intentions) that they are most effectively dehumanized. <br /><br />Even chimpanzees can make this judgment. Ethologists have observed that a subordinate male who is just minding his own business and gets the shit beaten out of him by a dominant male who happens to be in a bad mood and is looking to take it out on any hapless individual who crosses his path, gets more consolation from the group than a subordinate male who actively antagonizes the dominant male and gets an equal shit kicking. <br /><br />Chimpanzees can tell the difference between someone who is a blameless victim (had no agency), and someone who brought it on themselves (had agency), and they give more sympathy to the blameless victim.girlwriteswhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01589256798123593486noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-32610493296676138032016-01-11T01:02:14.429-08:002016-01-11T01:02:14.429-08:00Very interesting talk. I would also like to see th...Very interesting talk. I would also like to see the link on objectification. Nenadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10228535963115578437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1600902089077918514.post-20281626194522898652016-01-10T14:41:22.584-08:002016-01-10T14:41:22.584-08:00would be very interested in that link on objectifi...would be very interested in that link on objectification!Syntax_errorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12607408826796622577noreply@blogger.com