Saturday 27 February 2016

Transcript | Feminism: Decline of the family and erosion of freedom

I was asked to speak at the Essentials of Freedom Conference hosted by the Economic Association of Alberta yesterday. EAA is a right wing libertarian group who asked me to speak in 2014 on the topic of political correctness. Footage of that brief speech can be found here.

Footage of this event will be uploaded eventually, at which point I'll post a link, but I wanted to post the transcript here for posterity. 


A lot of you who are familiar with this topic might think that feminism’s war against the nuclear family began in the 1960s with the second wave. Prominent writers, activists and thought leaders of that era certainly seemed to have quite the bone to pick with men, the nuclear family and the institution of marriage. 

Robin Morgan, Catherine McKinnon, Linda Gordon, Sheila Cronin, Andrea Dworkin, and others all viciously attacked marriage above and beyond any other foundational institution of society.

From Dworkin: “Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.”

Gordon: “The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.”

Cronin: “Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage.”

Saner and more sedate feminists of the second wave objected to this kind of rhetoric. When equity feminist Christina Hoff Sommers told her husband what hardliners were saying about marriage and slavery, he reportedly asked her, “Which one of us is the master and which one of us is the slave again?”

But the feminist evolution of family life and marriage began long before the second wave. It was born in the discontent and resentments of radical suffragettes and militant feminists over a hundred years before. These women, some of whom you might be familiar with, also had many, many bones to pick with marriage as an institution, and family as a social construct.


1848 was a very interesting year for western civilization. It was notably the year the Communist Manifesto was published, but it was also in 1848 that another manifesto was published. This manifesto, known as the Declaration of Sentiments, was the end product of an historic conference on women’s rights held in Seneca Falls, New York. 

These two documents share some striking similarities. While the communist manifesto described society in terms of the class oppression by the elites of the working classes and called for revolution, the declaration of sentiments described society in terms of the class oppression by men of women. And it, too, called for revolution.

And a revolution followed.

According to the declaration of sentiments, 

“The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.”

The document goes on to describe some of these injuries and usurpations. For the purposes of my talk, I will concentrate on those that relate to marriage and family:


He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead.
He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns.

He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce, in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of the women [please keep that word--"happiness"--in mind as we continue]—the law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of a man [and keep in mind the word "supremacy", as well], and giving all power into his hands.


If I had an hour or three, I could explain to you all how these grievances are based on half-truths at best, false premises at worst. But in the limited time I have here, I will hopefully be able to convey to you the nature of the juggernaut that was unleashed at Seneca Falls with the publishing of this document, and how it has corrupted the relationship between men and women in western societies. 

I’m going to talk about two of the solutions feminism applied to these grievances, and how those solutions have undermined the institution of marriage and family.

At the time of the publishing of the Declaration of Sentiments, the body of laws governing men’s and women’s status within marriage was called coverture. The focus of these laws was to provide a realistic balance of rights and responsibilities between husbands and wives. Given the era we’re talking about, this necessitated a different set of rights and responsibilities between husband and wife, with the bulk of both the authority and obligations for the family resting on the husband. 

To put it plainly, coverture held a man 100% accountable for all the material necessities of himself, his wife and any children born into the marriage. Failure to do so to a reasonable standard meant social death for a man, and, sometimes, criminal prosecution under abandonment laws. As such, he held authority over jointly held property and the incomes of all family members. 

The flipside of this is that women bore no accountability for any of the material necessities of themselves, their husbands or their children. And, as such, they were granted subordinate rights as to the administration of income and property. 

Not NO rights, mind you. Different ones. And they were also granted legal protections and entitlements within the body of the laws—things like dower rights, which required a man to obtain his wife’s permission before selling a house he owned, due to her life interest in the property. A man was, essentially, barred from selling his house out from under his wife and putting her in the street. 

While single women could hold property and earn income, and enter into contracts, in their own names, once they married, they came under the umbrella of coverture laws.

Beginning in the 1860s, that began to change across the western world. Through legislation and legal precedent lobbied for by feminists, women’s legal right to property within marriage gradually took on the aspect of, “What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is ours.”

This led to a number of legal complications. A married woman could, legally, enter into a contract like a loan, but it was her husband who was ultimately responsible for paying it back. She was assigned taxes on her income and property, but it was her husband who was ultimately responsible for paying them. And of course, he was forced by law to do so AFTER paying for all of her material necessities, and his, and the children’s, out of his own income. 

At the same time, he had lost any right or claim to administer her income and property, or to even demand she provide him documentation of it. He became entirely reliant on her voluntary goodwill and sense of personal responsibility to not abuse this imbalance of power. 

And, if you were so inclined, you could find some interesting stories from around 1910 of men jailed for tax evasion when their wealthy wives refused to pay their taxes, or to provide their husbands the necessary documentation to do so. 

When coverture laws were in effect, there were laws protecting women from a husband’s potential abuse of his greater authority. 

When feminists began dismantling that body of laws, they put nothing in place to protect men from a wife’s abuse of her new legal authority.

And abuse it, some women did, particularly in the case of legal separation. So long as neither party to the marriage could prove just cause for dissolving it, divorce was out of the question. But there were women who, for whatever reason, legally separated from their husbands, set up a separate residence at his expense, and were entitled to monthly alimony. Even if they were capable of supporting themselves, and even if they earned more money than their husbands. And if, after 5 or 10 years of legal separation, such a woman decided she wanted to move back in with her husband and he refused to take her back into his home? Yes, he could be charged with a crime—abandonment.

Alimony reform societies began to crop up in the US in the early 1900s through the 1920s, many of them led by enthusiastic and principled spokeswomen and promoted by female lawyers, judges and magistrates, to address the plight of the thousands of men mired in the limbo of legal separation and indefinite alimony, with no hope of remarrying or ever having legitimate children.

I can’t imagine this state of affairs did much to make marriage an attractive prospect for a man. I think such an arrangement might, to a man who had an understanding of the law, look like financial servitude. You know, like slavery. 

It would not be until after the failure in the 1960s of the Equal Rights Amendment in the US before case law began to catch up with this extraordinary situation regarding a married woman’s right to hold property as if she were single, while being entitled to the full financial support of her husband. 

How was this change brought about? Did feminists suddenly realize such a situation was unfair to husbands? Nope. They were vexed by the fact that, when applying for a loan, a woman was required by most lenders to provide the cosignature of the man who would be held ultimately responsible for repayment of the debt if she defaulted. 

They deemed this state of affairs to be “arbitrary sexism against women.” Only after this practice  by lenders had been made illegal did case law finally begin to catch up to the new reality, and women finally became legally responsible for debts they’d unilaterally entered into, and equally responsible for joint debts within marriage. 

But perhaps what had the greatest impact on the status of families in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was something called the Tender Years Doctrine.

This legal innovation, which has its origins in feminist advocacy in the UK in 1839, and was further expanded in 1873, changed the presumption of custody of a couple’s children following divorce from default father custody to default mother custody. 

Keep in mind, this set of legal standards and policies did not rest on the fitness, or lack thereof, of any particular parent, or the best interests of any particular child, but on the assumption that sole mother custody was in the best interest of all children.

Keep in mind as well, this new legal standard did not affect the financial responsibilities of either parent toward the children. The father still bore sole financial responsibility to maintain the household of his minor children, of which his ex wife was now the head. This necessarily meant that no matter who was at fault for the divorce, and no matter what the incomes of either party, it fell to the man to provide material support to his children, their household and their legal custodian and guardian.

In other words, back under the misogyny of coverture laws, men got the kids, and they also got the bill, and feminists deemed that to be “male supremacy”.

Under feminism? Women got the kids, and… well, men still got the bill. And not just the bill for the kids, but for his ex-wife who was now entitled to his support as the legal custodian and guardian of his children. A man was now responsible for supporting a family of which he was no longer a member, and within which he had no paternal rights. 

From the UK, the doctrine spread across the western world, because it served "women’s happiness."

Once it was in place, despite the extreme difficulty involved in obtaining a divorce at the time, the divorce rate, which had been consistently low for centuries, rose 15 fold in just 50 years.

These reforms essentially turned family break-up into a profitable enterprise for many women, removing the costs to women of separation and divorce, and tilting the balance of rights and obligations within marriage, and post-divorce, fully in women’s favor.

It was so profitable, in fact, that in the US in the 1910s and 20s, there were scam artists whose con was to marry a man, legally separate from him and collect alimony, move to another jurisdiction and take on an alias, marry another man, then legally separate from HIM… and, well, there were some women who were married to, and simultaneously collecting alimony from, 4 or 5 different men before they were caught and prosecuted—usually not for financial fraud, but for polygamy. 

Which I suppose was good news for the first poor guy she targeted, as he at least now had grounds for divorce and could now remarry.

Yep. Stuff you’ll never hear about in a gender studies class…

Yet despite all of this, by the 1960s, feminists seemed less enamored of marriage than ever. Betty Friedan famously called the institution a “comfortable concentration camp” in her 1963 breakout bestseller, “The Feminine Mystique.” The book was an interesting new take on the oppression of women, in that its thesis seemed to be that married middle class women were oppressed by boredom more than anything else. Modern conveniences had made the life of a middle class housewife so easy, she now had plenty of time to ruminate on how awful everything was. 

Less generous in her description of marriage was author and scholar Marylin French, who said:

"All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey."

The 1960s saw a massive spike in divorce rates in the US as a concerted campaign of slander against men, and “patriarchal” institutions such as marriage and family, began with political leaflets, small press magazines and books and protest rallies, from there, seeping into news media and popular culture. 

Hating men was the new black. All the cool kids were doing it. 

Following so closely on this spike in divorce that the lines on a graph are nearly indistinguishable from each other, was what would become a 30 year rise in the rates of crime. 

Why? Well, however a given woman might feel about divorcing her husband, it’s almost never very good news for the kids. 

Growing up without a father in the home is correlated with 2 to 10 times higher rates of being suspended or expelled from school, dropping out at all levels of education, not going to college at all, committing crimes, suffering depression, anxiety and behavioral disorders, becoming victims of violence and abuse, becoming teenage parents, having children outside of long term relationships, and committing suicide. They also have a much higher likelihood of getting involved in gangs, abusing alcohol and drugs, and being incarcerated as juveniles and adults. 

Statistically, the situation in which a child is most likely to suffer physical abuse or targeted neglect is in the sole physical custody of a single parent mother. 

Statistically, the situation in which children are safest and most likely to do well in life is in an intact family that includes their biological father. 

And for all of feminism’s rhetoric about domestic violence against women and the oppression of the marital institution? An intact family is the safest place for a woman, too. 

And yet every single reform to marital and family law over the last 150 years, most of it at the behest of the feminist lobby, has been to facilitate divorce and family break-up, and to physically separate men from their own children if the mother sees fit. 

More than this, feminism has helped to normalize the unilateral decision by many women to create families without the consent, cooperation or involvement of fathers. Under feminism’s watch, the word family has morphed into the phrase “women and their children”. In defiance of every credible piece of social science and social psychology research, fathers are now considered unnecessary to children, a superfluous luxury at best, a potential abuser at worst. 

And what does this mean for freedom? 

First off, it means more kids, particularly boys, being shunted into the school to prison pipeline. It means shifting the dependence of mothers from dependence on a marriage partner to dependence on state social programs and subsidies. It means men being jailed for the crime of being laid off and unable to comply with child support orders. It means the government taking money from men, shaving off their nickel or dime or quarter, and handing what’s left to women and children. It means massive government bureaucracies and legal structures that are ever more interested in micromanaging relationships between men and women, and between parents and their children.

It means the erosion of due process protections whenever an allegation is made of a man harming a woman, particularly if she is his intimate partner. 

It means protection orders that can be obtained within minutes at the drop of a hat without any evidence, or even any CLAIM, by a woman that her husband is violent—just the suggestion that she’s worried he might become violent.

It means ever bigger and hungrier government systems to deal with it all. It means higher taxes, more people in prison, and the government getting to decide how often a man will see his children, under what conditions, and how much he will have to pay for the privilege. 

Just a month ago, I received a phone call out of the blue from a complete stranger, the distraught brother of a man in Northern Alberta who’d been jailed on several charges.

His wife, a drug addict, had left the family home, abandoning him and their two children for almost a year. He made do for that year as a single father while dealing with occasional court appearances regarding custody of the children, appearances brought by his estranged wife, but for which she mostly didn’t bother to show up. 

One night, a couple of months ago, she showed up at his door asking to stay the night and suggesting they reconcile. He allowed her to sleep on the couch. In the middle of the night, she removed the kids from the home and took them to a domestic violence shelter less than two blocks away. The staff there helped her to apply for an emergency order of protection, which she was granted, and to file a police report alleging he’d physically abused her.  

The next day he was picked up by police on the domestic violence complaint, and was jailed for violation of a protection order he, until that point, had no idea existed. How was he in violation? His home was less than 500 meters from the domestic violence shelter his wife had absconded to. 

He'd had no idea there was a protection order, and no idea where she had gone with his children, but he was in violation, so off to jail he went.

False allegations of domestic violence and child abuse have become known to family court judges and family lawyers as “part of the gamesmanship of divorce”. Such allegations can be brought by both men and women, but because of feminist influence on policy, it is overwhelmingly women who bring them, and overwhelmingly women who are ultimately successful at winning the jackpot through their abuse of process. 

There are typically no penalties assigned for lying about abuse in a family court, and accusers are rarely prosecuted after making false criminal allegations of abuse to bolster their case in a divorce or custody dispute.

We have weaponized a system of laws and policies regarding family violence and protection of women that, while well-intentioned, violate our constitutional protections. 

More broadly in terms of feminism’s war on the family and its impact on wider society, I want to tell you about a small, poor ostensibly matriarchal culture called the Mosuo that exists in China, near its border with Tibet. They have no land worth stealing, produce little more than what they need to survive, most don’t have electricity or running water, and all of their technology has been borrowed from other cultures. They’ve become little more than a tourist attraction, tourism now forming the bulk of their tiny economy.

They have a very different form of marriage from us, and their neighbors, sometimes called “visiting” or “walking” marriage. What this amounts to is that a man might visit the room of his spouse after dark and must return to the communal quarters of his own family’s home before dawn. The children belong to the mother and are raised by her and her brothers, sisters and cousins. The father might provide the child with small gifts, but is not expected to invest anything in its care or upbringing--in fact, he's discouraged from doing so.

At the same time, the social organization of the mosuo was historically feudal, and historically the elites practiced a more traditional form of marriage. 

Anthropologists have speculated that the “visiting marriage” system had been imposed on the serf class by the elites in order to weaken their social fabric and eliminate any possible threat to the power of the elites to subjugate them. 

If that doesn’t scare you, I don’t know what will. 

We have seen an unprecedented cultural shift since feminism from the expectation of self-sufficiency to one where the state’s got everything taken care of. 

From our expectation of both men and women to make responsible reproductive choices that will facilitate positive outcomes for kids, to one where family courts willingly handicap kids in the name of the best interests of the child. 

Where one of the data points officials in the US use to determine how many prisons need to be built is the reading scores of 8 year old boys. 

And all the while, government gets bigger and more powerful and feminists lobby for ever more draconian measures to protect women and children from the very people who are the least likely to harm them—their husbands and fathers—and the very people who are most likely to shield them from poverty, harm and adversity.

The nuclear family is the foundation of every successful civilization, and what makes our families different from the families of our closest primate relatives—gorillas, bonobos, chimpanzees—and, indeed, from EVERY other species of mammal on the planet, is the expectation of voluntary investment, physical, financial, emotional and psychological, of every father in the children they help create.

You know. Marriage.

Feminists called that the enslavement of women, and were determined to destroy it. And we are now beginning to reap what they’ve sown. Millennial men are the first generation of young men in the US who will be, on average, less educated than their fathers. Young black men in the US have a 75% chance of being raised without a dad in the home, and a 33% likelihood of spending time behind bars.

Our social fabric is disintegrating from the bottom up, leaving all of us vulnerable. And whether this is merely the law of unintended consequences at work, or a tin-foil hat conspiracy by people with power and influence, the result will be the same. 

A bigger, more powerful, more intrusive government and an erosion of all our individual freedoms. 




46 comments:

  1. Great speech!

    One might note that the woman credited as the progenitor of the Tender Years Doctrine, Caroline Norton, fought her husband using exactly those privileges you describe.

    http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/norton/biography.html

    The account of her and her husband is hardly impartial, but one can glean that she was living above their (his) means - "the lifestyle she was accustomed to" - and he was unable to control her. He beat her (according to her), she cheated on him (according to him), and she finally left him. She started making money as a writer, and obviously didn't share that income with him, and she later started running up debt that he was forced to pay.

    Ironically, once she had helped get the Infant Custody Bill signed into law, her husband had fled with their sons to Scotland, outside English jurisdiction.

    Caroline Norton, feminist hero.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What an extraordinary essay. Gave you ten bucks for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What an extraordinary essay. Gave you ten bucks for it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "“Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution."

    And yet in the end it is men who are abandoning the institution. Women kept marrying right through all this theorizing because they apparently saw things differently. it is the MGTOWS who agree that marriage is slavery.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And people wonder why I get angry at feminism. Maybe because it's a major contributing factor - arguably flat-out the cause - of my civilization slowly unravelling and the social fabric of my people being torn apart.

    ReplyDelete
  6. another really good write up by Karen.

    But I think the system is so stupidly blind that it will take an actual collapse before they wake up to their own part in their own demise... I notice the MGTOW movement is constantly growing in spite of continual bad mouthing... why is that? could it have anything to do with reality? you bet!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're too optimistic. A collapse isn't going to make everyone magically understand what they didn't before. They're not going to learn anything from it. They'll never wake up.

      Delete
  7. Hello Karen,
    I'm somewhat new to your blog and channel but always try to watch videos with you in them when I have time. Correct me if Im wrong but in many of your speeches, videos etc. you mostly point out the inequalities between men and women and the damage it causes to men. I do find this very important. I was wondering however if you had any solutions for some of the problems. Like if a man's rights group similar to NOW were to go to the goverment and say "This is what we want", what would you want them to say? Should these issues be addressed legally or more in a general social way?

    When I think of the topic of divorce involving children, there seems to be no way to make it perfectly fair and 50/50, so how should the courts approach such situations?

    Regarding child support what might you suggest to be a fair solution? I agree that it is shitty that a father is forced to have to pay for a child that he didnt want and may not even be permitted to see. But Im curious to know what you or for that matter anyone would like to see happen to make this more equal.

    When I think about reproductive rights I think we can all agree that it is an asymetrical issue concidering the biological facts of reproduction which makes prioritizing the rights of the of the baby, father and mother a very difficult topic to which there is no perfect answer.

    Im interested in your opinion/solutions on those issues where men currently draw the shittier end of the stick regarding issues to which there is no perfectly equal solution. Things like quotas having a very simple solution...that is, get rid of them.

    Keep up the great work!

    ReplyDelete
  8. A little off topic, but have you seen this?

    http://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-true-story-of-the-gender-pay-gap-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/

    Thanks for what you do,
    Grace

    ReplyDelete
  9. Damn, you were speaking in Edmonton and I missed it. Would be cool if you had a public appearance schedule posted

    ReplyDelete
  10. Karen, I don't say this likely: this was brilliant.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I wasn't aware of the historical precedents. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wasn't aware of the historical precedents. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  13. How I Was Rescued By A God Fearing Lender (Lexieloancompany@yahoo.com)

    Hello, I am Andrew Thompson currently living in CT USA, God has bless me with two kids and a lovely Wife, I promise to share this Testimony because of God favor in my life, 2days ago I was in desperate need of money so I thought of having a loan then I ran into wrong hands who claimed to be loan lender not knowing he was a scam. he collected 1,500.00 USD from me and refuse to email me since then I was confuse, but God came to my rescue, one faithful day I went to church after the service I share idea with a friend and she introduce me to LEXIE LOAN COMPANY, she said she was given 98,000.00 USD by MR LEXIE , THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF LEXIE LOAN COMPANY. So I collected his email Address , he told me the rules and regulation and I followed, then after processing of the Documents, he gave me my loan of 55,000.00 USD... So if you are interested in a loan you can as well contact him on this Email: lexieloancompany@yahoo.com or text +1(406) 946-0675 thanks, I am sure he will also help you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. With the help of a man called Dr.Addo I was able to get pregnant though his root and herbs. I'm 47years of age, it was really difficult for me to pregnant though my husband loves me but it was really hurting me not having my own child but after many years I came across Dr.Addo. I'm 7months pregnant now through the help of the wonderful man and I will advice everyone looking for help to get pregnant to contact this great man via his email at: ( addosolution@gmail.com ) and be happy like me.

    Vivian from CANADA

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hello, I'm here to introduce someone to you all, his name is Dr.Ekpen Temple a spell caster that help me restored my broken relationship, I saw an article on the Internet someone talking about him how he help her in her relationship, today I'm a beneficial of that article, so that is why I'm also talking about how he has helped me so that someone out there that is facing the same challenge can also contact him for help. Here is DR EKPEN TEMPLE contact info: (ekpentemple@gmail.com) or on Whatsapp number 2347050270218.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I just want to thank you for the work you do.
    gclub
    gclub casino online

    ReplyDelete
  18. āđ€āļĨāđ€āļ‹āļ­āļĢ์āļŦāļ™้āļēāđƒāļŠ āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ­ีāļāļŦāļ™ึ่āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄ่āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄāļ—ี่āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāļŸื้āļ™āļŸูāļœิāļ§āļŦāļ™ัāļ‡āļ—ี่āđāļŦ้āļ‡āļ”้āļēāļ™ āļšāļĢิāđ€āļ§āļ“āđƒāļšāļŦāļ™้āļēāļŦāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĨ้āļģāđƒāļŦ้āļāļĨัāļšāļĄāļēāļœ่āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļ”āļŠื่āļ™ āļœ่āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļŠ่āļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ­ัāļ™āđ€āļĢ็āļ§ āļ™ัāļšāļ§่āļēāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļĨัāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ§āļĒāļ‡āļēāļĄāļ—ี่āļāļģāļĨัāļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļŠูāļ‡ āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāļĢัāļšāđƒāļŠ้āļœิāļ§āđƒāļŦ้āļ‚āļēāļ§āļāļĢāļ°āļˆ่āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļēāļ§āđƒāļŠ āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļĨāļēāļ‡āđ€āļĨืāļ­āļ™āļĢิ้āļ§āļĢāļ­āļĒāļˆุāļ”āļ”่āļēāļ‡āļ”āļģāđ„āļ”้āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĄีāļ„ุāļ“āļ āļēāļž

    āđ€āļĨāđ€āļ‹āļ­āļĢ์āļŦāļ™้āļēāđƒāļŠ
    āđ€āļĨāđ€āļ‹āļ­āļĢ์āļĨāļ”āļĢิ้āļ§āļĢāļ­āļĒ
    āđ€āļĨāđ€āļ‹āļ­āļĢ์āļĢāļ­āļĒāļŠิāļ§

    ReplyDelete
  19. āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŸāļĢี āļ—ี่ SLOTXO369 āđ„āļĄ่āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™ SLOTXO āđ€āļ‚้āļēāļ–ึāļ‡āđ„āļ”้āļ‡่āļēāļĒ 24 āļŠāļĄ.
    https://www.slotxo369.com/

    ReplyDelete
  20. Avoid artificial sugars Avoid sugar substitutes such as stevia, sucralose, or aspartame, as these sugar substitutes are calorie-free. And does not affect blood sugar levels But may still make you IMIWINaddicted to sweetness And can not reduce sweet eating effectively

    ReplyDelete
  21. When an infection occurs in the kidney area Or the occurrence of kidney stones Will cause pain in the lower left stomach Which can separate both from the side effects that occur By nephritis Is accompanied by acute lower left abdominal pain Urinary painimiwin88 all the time Has burning pain while urinating Or may also have blood in urine While kidney stones are accompanied by high fever. Nausea and vomiting are accompanied by pain. At the thighs

    ReplyDelete

  22. Brow package Available in both tubes and pump bottles. That can be used in full force! This one is a face wash that received Best Cosme 2016 award, which is great for sensitive skin. Because it is free of alcohol, colors, fragrances, mineral oils and parabens, and has passed allergy testing by Japanese dermatologists. This will help clean dirt gently. Wash thoroughly to the pores. After washing it does not make the skin dry and tight. It also helps to maintain moisture on the skin. With excellent
    IMIBET ceramides and amino acids, this one is worth a try. It's inexpensive too.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Mae rhwydweithiau cymdeithasol wedi bod yn rhan o strategaeth y cwmni, ac felly mae ganddyn nhw gynnwys ar gyfer Facebook hefyd. Fe welwch gardiau crafu rhithwir, gemau arcÊd a gemau mini, y gellir eu chwarae ar eu gwefan.

    Mae'r nifer fwyaf o gemau yn mynd i berthyn i'r categori Slotiau serch hynny. Maent yn eu cymysgu, gan gynnig peiriannau slot clasurol a modern, gyda 3 neu 5 rÃŪl. Rwyf wedi dod o hyd i fwy nag ychydig o gemau yma a oedd yn bleserus, gyda graffeg, themÃĒu a nodweddion da.
    IMIWIN

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bangkok reduces travel screening points to 5 points
    Deputy Permanent Secretary of Bangkok, Silpa Suayraweesangsoon, revealed that due to the epidemic situation In a better direction The epidemic was controlled to a satisfactory level. Bangkok therefore saw that The establishment of the screening checkpoint for traveling to Bangkok should be canceled. From 29 Jan 64

    IMIWIN
    āđ‚āļ›āļĢāđ‚āļĄāļŠั่āļ™imiwin
    āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢimiwin

    ReplyDelete

  25. āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļĒิāļ‡āļ›āļĨāļē

    āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļĒิāļ‡āļ›āļĨāļē āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„่āļēāļĒāđ„āļŦāļ™ āļĄีāđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļāļĨ้āļ§āļĒāđ†
    āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āđ„āļĄ่āļี่āđ€āļ”ืāļ­āļ™āļ—ี่āļœ่āļēāļ™āļĄāļē āļ­ัāļ•āļĢāļēāđ€āļ•ิāļšāđ‚āļ•āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢิāļĄāļēāļ“āļ„āļ™āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ›āļĢัāļšāļžāļĪāļ•ิāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļžิ่āļĄāļŠูāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļ‚ึ้āļ™ āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™ึ่āļ‡āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āđƒāļ”āđ€āļ™ื่āļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ§่āļēāđ€āļĨืāļ­āļāļŦāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ™ี้ āļ›āļĢāļ°āļĒุāļāļ•์āđƒāļŠ้āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŦāļēāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļāļēāļĢāļ“์ covid-19 āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāļ•่āļēāļ‡āđ†āļ›ิāļ”āļ•ัāļ§āļĨāļ‡ āđ„āļĄ่āļ­āļēāļˆāļˆāļ°āđ€āļ”ิāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ„āļ›āđƒāļŠ้āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢ āļ็āđ€āļĨāļĒāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āđ†āļˆัāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļ°āļ—ี่āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļāļĄāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļŠูāļ‡ āđ€āļ™ื่āļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ§่āļēāļ„āļ™āļ­āļĒู่āļš้āļēāļ™āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļ āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ§็āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāđ€āļĨāļĒāļĄีāļāļēāļĢāļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļŠāļĄāļŠāļ­āļš āđāļĨ้āļ§āļ็āļ‚āļ­āļ„āļģāļ›āļĢึāļāļĐāļēāļˆāļēāļāļāļĨุ่āļĄāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡ āđ‚āļ›āļĢāđ‚āļĄāļŠั่āļ™āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļ–āļēāļĄāļ§่āļē āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„่āļēāļĒāđ„āļŦāļ™āļš้āļēāļ‡ āļ—ี่āļĄีāđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ‡่āļēāļĒ āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļŠื่āļ™āļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœู้āļĢัāļšāļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢ āļ‹ึ่āļ‡āļĄีāļāļēāļĢāļ„ัāļ”āđāļĒāļāļ­āļ­āļāļĄāļē 5 āļŠั้āļ™ āļ„่āļēāļĒāđ€āļāļĄāļ—ี่āļĄีāđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ‡่āļēāļĒ āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļ”้āļ”ิāļšāđ„āļ”้āļ”ี āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄีāđ€āļ™ื้āļ­āļŦāļēāļ”ัāļ‡āļ•่āļ­āđ„āļ›āļ™ี้

    ReplyDelete
  26. āļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•Joker āļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ™ุāļ
    āļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•joker āļĒิāļ™āļ”ีāļ•āļ­āļ™āļĢัāļšāđ€āļ‚้āļēāļŠู่āđ€āļ§็āļšimiwin āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļ—ี่āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļ­āļĒāļēāļāļĄāļēāļāđƒāļ™āļ›ี2020 āļŠāļģāļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚้āļēāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļŦāļĢืāļ­ āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ•āļ­āļ™āļ™ี้āļ–ืāļ­āļ§่āļēāđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļ—ี่āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđƒāļ™āđ‚āļĨāļāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđƒāļ™āļĒุāļ„āļ›ัāļˆāļˆุāļšัāļ™ āļŦāļĄู่āļœู้āļ„āļ™āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āđƒāļŦāļ่ āđāļĄ้āļˆāļ°āļĄāļēāđƒāļ™āļĢูāļ›āđāļšāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ”ิāļĄāđ†āļŦāļĢืāļ­ āļŠื่āļ­ āđ€āļ”ิāļĄāđ†āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāļĄāļ™ั้āļ™ āļ—ี่āđ€āļĢāļēāļ„ุ้āļ™āļŦูāļัāļ™āđāļĨ้āļ§ āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļĢāļēāļ็āļĄีāļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ”ิāļĄāļžัāļ™ āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļĄāļ­āļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•ื่āļ™āļ™āđ€āļ•้āļ™āđƒāļŦ้āļ—่āļēāļ™āļ­ีāļ

    āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•joker āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļĢู้āļˆัāļāļัāļ™āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ°āđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĢืāļ­āļ‚่āļēāļĒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡ joker gaming āļ•้āļ™āļāļģāđ€āļ™ิāļ”āđāļĢāļāđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢัāļāļ­āđ€āļĄāļĢิāļāļē āđāļĨāļ°āļ–ูāļāđ€āļĢีāļĒāļāļ§่āļē “Poker” āļŦāļĢืāļ­ āđ€āļĢีāļĒāļāđ€āļžี้āļĒāļ™ āđ€āļ›็āļ™ “Pokie” āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ­āļ­āļŠāđ€āļ•āļĢāđ€āļĨีāļĒ āļ—ี่āļĄีāļ›āļĢāļ°āļ§ัāļ•ิāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢ์ āļĄāļēāļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĒāļēāļ§āļ™āļēāļ™āļĄāļēāđāļĨ้āļ§ āļˆึāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļˆāļģāđāļāļ‡āļ­āļĒู่āļัāļšāđ€āļšื้āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĨัāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡ āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āđ€āļŦāļĨ่āļēāļ™ั้āļ™
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēts911

    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēts911

    IMIWIN

    ReplyDelete
  27. āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāđƒāļŦāļĄ่āļĢัāļšāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļŸāļĢี 100% āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āđāļ„่āļ™ั้āļ™
    āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļŸāļĢีāļ—ี่āļ—่āļēāļ™āļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļš āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āļ›āļĢัāļšāđƒāļŦ้āđƒāļ™āļšัāļāļŠีāļŦāļĨัāļāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāđƒāļ™āļ—ัāļ™āļ—ีāļ•ั้āļ‡āđāļ•่āļ•āļ­āļ™āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢ āļˆ่āļēāļĒāļŠูāļ‡āļŠุāļ” 1,000 āļšāļēāļ—āļ•่āļ­ 1 USER
    āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļŸāļĢีāļ–āļ­āļ™āđ„āļ”้ āđāļĄ้āļāļĢāļ°āļ™ั้āļ™āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļžāļĪāļ•ิāļ•āļēāļĄāļ‚้āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™ āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡āđ€āļāļĄāļŠ์āļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ­ื่āļ™āđ†āđƒāļŦ้āļĄี āļĒāļ­āļ”āļŦāļĄุāļ™āļ§āļ™āļ„āļĢāļš 10 āđ€āļ—่āļē
    āļŠāļĄāļēāļŠิāļāđƒāļŦāļĄ่āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđāļˆ้āļ‡āđ„āļ”้āļ§่āļēāļˆāļ°āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļĢัāļšāđ„āļŦāļĄāļĢัāļšāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļŸāļĢีāļ็āđ„āļ”้
    āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđāļ™āļ°āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļ™āļž้āļ­āļ‡āļĢัāļšāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđ‚āļĄāļŠั่āļ™20% āļˆāļēāļāļĒāļ­āļ”āļāļēāļāđāļĢāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļ™āļž้āļ­āļ‡
    IMIWIN
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēimiwin
    IMI WIN

    ReplyDelete
  28. lsm99 āļŠāļ§ัāļŠāļ”ีāļ„่āļ°āļŠāļĄāļēāļŠิāļāļ—ุāļāļ„āļ™ āļĒิāļ™āļ”ีāđƒāļŦ้āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāļ™āļ°āļ„āļ° āđ€āļĢāļēāļĄีāļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦ้āđāļ”่āļ—่āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”้āđ€āļĨืāļ­āļāļŠāļ™ุāļāļŠāļ™āļēāļ™āļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒ āļĒāļāļ•ัāļ§āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āđ€āļŠ่āļ™ āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđāļ—āļ‡āļšāļ­āļĨ āļĄāļ§āļĒ āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ•่āļēāļ‡āđ†āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āļĒัāļ‡āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡ āļŦāļ§āļĒāđ„āļ—āļĒ āļŦāļ§āļĒāļĢัāļāļšāļēāļĨ āļžāļĢ้āļ­āļĄāļŦāļ™้āļēāļžāļĢ้āļ­āļĄāļ•āļēāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠ้āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—ี่āļŠāļ°āļ”āļ§āļ āļ–้āļēāļŦāļēāļāļĄีāļ›ัāļāļŦāļē āļŦāļĢืāļ­āļ›āļĢāļēāļĢāļ–āļ™āļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđƒāļŦ้āļāļēāļĢāļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļĨืāļ­ āđ€āļĢāļēāļĄีāļ—ีāļĄāļ§āļēāļ™āļžāļĢ้āļ­āļĄāđƒāļŦ้āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢ āļ”้āļ§āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļ•ิāļ”āļ•่āļ­āļ—āļēāļ‡ āđ‚āļ—āļĢāļĻัāļžāļ—์ Line āļŦāļĢืāļ­ Live Chat āļšāļ™āļŦāļ™้āļēāđ€āļ§็āļšāđ„āļ”้āđƒāļ™āļ—ัāļ™āļ—ี

    ReplyDelete
  29. ts911
    āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđāļĨāļ° āđāļ—āļ‡āļšāļ­āļĨāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđāļšāļšāļ„āļĢāļšāļ§āļ‡āļˆāļĢ āļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļŠุāļ”āļĒāļ­āļ”āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļŠูāļ‡āļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđ€āļ—่āļēāļ—ี่āđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄีāļĄāļē āļāļēāļĢัāļ™āļ•ีāđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļŠีāļĒāļ‡āđ€āļ”ีāļĒāļ§āļัāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļœู้āđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āļˆāļĢิāļ‡āļāļ§่āļē 1,000,000 āļ„āļ™āļ•่āļ­āļ§ัāļ™ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āđ€āļ§็āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļ™ิāļĒāļĄāđ€āļĒāļ­āļ°āļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļŠāļĄ่āļģāđ€āļŠāļĄāļ­āļˆāļēāļāđƒāļ™āļ›ี 2019 āļ่āļ­āļ™āļŦāļ™้āļēāļ™ี้ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡āļĄีāļ—ิāļĻāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ§่āļēāļˆāļ°āđ€āļĒāļ­āļ°āļ‚ึ้āļ™āđ€āļĢื่āļ­āļĒāđ†āļ”้āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ›ี 2020 āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāļ§ัāļ™āļ™ี้āļĢัāļšāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļŸāļĢี!!! āļ„่āļēāļŠูāļ‡āļŠุāļ” 1,500 āļšāļēāļ—

    ReplyDelete
  30. āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™joker1234
    joker1234 āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđ‚āļĨāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ—ี่āļ›āļĨāļ­āļ”āļ ัāļĒāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļ—ุāļāļ„āļ™
    āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™ิāļĒāļĄāļŠāļĄāļŠāļ­āļšāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļ—ี่āđ€āļĒāļ­āļ°āļ‚ึ้āļ™āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–ึāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļ—āļĢāļēāļšāļ–ึāļ‡āļ„ุāļ“āļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļ—ี่āļĄีāļ„ุāļ“āļ āļēāļžāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āđ€āļิāļ”āļŠ่āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđ€āļžื่āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢ้āļēāļ‡āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”้āļ—ี่āļ‡่āļēāļĒāļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡āļĄีāļĄูāļĨāļ„่āļēāļŠูāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļ‚ึ้āļ™āđāļšāļšāđ„āļĄ่āļˆāļģāļัāļ” āļ—ั้āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļ”āļ—ั้āļ‡āļ›āļ§āļ‡āļ™ี้āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļœāļĨāļ—ี่āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļĨืāļ­āđƒāļŦ้āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļšāļ™āđ€āļ§็āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•์āļĢัāļšāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđƒāļ™āđ‚āļĨāļāļ­ิāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ­āļĢ์āđ€āļ™็āļ•āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļĢู้āļŠึāļāļŠื่āļ™āļŠāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœู้āļĢัāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–ึāļ‡āļ„āļ™āļ—ี่āļžึāļ‡āļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāļĢ่āļ§āļĄāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ี่āļĒัāļ‡āđ„āļĄ่āđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄีāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“์āļĄāļēāļ่āļ­āļ™āļ—ุāļāļ„āļ™āļ­āļĒāļēāļāļ—āļĢāļēāļšāļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āđƒāļ”āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™ึ่āļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦ้āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļ™āļĢูāļ›āđāļšāļšāļ™ี้ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ§่āļēāļ—ุāļāļ„āļ™āļĻึāļāļĐāļēāļ„้āļ™āļžāļšāļ§่āļēāļŦāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨิāļ•āļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”้āļˆāļēāļāđ€āļ§็āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•์āļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āļāļģāđ€āļ™ิāļ”āđ„āļ”้āļ—ุāļāļŦāļ™āļ—ุāļāđāļŦ่āļ‡āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āļĄีāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļŠื่āļ­āļĄāļ•่āļ­āļ­ิāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ­āļĢ์āđ€āļ™็āļ•āļ—ี่āļ”ีāļĄีāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđƒāļ™āļšัāļāļŠีāđ€āļžื่āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āļ™ิāļ”āļŦāļ™่āļ­āļĒāđāļĨ้āļ§āļ็āļĄāļ­āļ‡āļŦāļēāļ§ิāļŠāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢู้āđ€āļšื้āļ­āļ‡āļ•้āļ™āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™ิāļ„āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ—ี่āļ”ีāđ€āļžื่āļ­āđ€āļื้āļ­āļŦāļ™ุāļ™āđƒāļŦ้āļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ”้āđ‚āļ­āļāļēāļŠāļŠāļ™āļ°āđ„āļ”้āļš่āļ­āļĒāļĄāļēāļāļ‚ึ้āļ™āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļ”้āļ”ิāļšāđ„āļ”้āļ”ีāļ‚ึ้āļ™āļ‹ึ่āļ‡āļ§ิāļ˜ีāļāļĨุ่āļĄāļ™ี้āļĄีāđƒāļŦ้āļ—่āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”้āđ€āļĨืāļ­āļāđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āļัāļ™āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļžื่āļ­āļŠāļĢ้āļēāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ—ี่āļ”ีāđ€āļĒี่āļĒāļĄāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđƒāļŦ้āļัāļšāļ—ุāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™
    IMIWIN
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēimiwin
    IMI WIN

    ReplyDelete
  31. āļ„ุāļ“āļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ°
    āļ āļēāļĒāļŦāļĨัāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āđāļĄāļŠāļŠีāļ™āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļ—ี่āļĄāļēāļˆāļēāļ 1X2 Gaming āļ‰ัāļ™āļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦ็āļ™āļ•้āļ™āđāļšāļšāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđ€āļžื่āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļˆัāļ”āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ„ุāļ“āļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ° āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļĄāļēāļāđ„āļĄ่āļ™้āļ­āļĒāđ€āļĨāļĒāļ—ีāđ€āļ”ีāļĒāļ§āļˆāļ°āļĄีāđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ„ุāļ“āļŠāļĄāļšัāļ•ิāļŠāļēāļĄāđāļšāļš āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļˆāļ°āļĄีāļŠāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđƒāļŦ้āđ€āļĨืāļ­āļāđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŦāļĨัāļ āđ„āļ§āļ”์āđāļĨ้āļ§āļ็āļŠāđ€āļ­็āļ‡āļ•āđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢ์āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠิ่āļ‡āļ—ี่āļ­āļĒู่āđƒāļ™āļ™ั้āļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļĄีāđ€āļ„āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļžิ่āļĄāđ€āļ•ิāļĄāļ­ีāļāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§่āļēāļ‡āļŸāļĢีāļŠāļ›ิāļ™āļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļˆ่āļēāļĒāđ€āļžิ่āļĄ āļŠāļ­āļšāļĄีāļ•ัāļ§āļ„ูāļ“āļ—ี่āđ€āļี่āļĒāļ§āđ€āļŠ่āļ™āđ€āļ”ีāļĒāļ§āļัāļ™ āđƒāļŠ้āđƒāļ™āļŸāļĢีāļŠāļ›ิāļ™āļŦāļĢืāļ­āļ•ิāļ”āļ­āļĒู่āļ—ี่āđ„āļ§āļ”์

    āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ„āļĄ่āđ€āļŦ็āļ™āļ„ุāļ“āļŠāļĄāļšัāļ•ิāļžิāđ€āļĻāļĐāđ€āļ‰āļžāļēāļ°āđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄ āđ€āļ™ื่āļ­āļ‡āļ”้āļ§āļĒāļĄิāđ„āļ”้āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļŦāļ™ึ่āļ‡āļŠ่āļ§āļ™āđƒāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢัāļŠāļāļē 1X2 āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļ„ุāļ“āļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļĄāļēāļāļĒิ่āļ‡āļāļ§่āļēāļŦāļ™ึ่āļ‡āļŦāļĢืāļ­āļŠāļ­āļ‡āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ—ั้āļ‡āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ›āļāļ•ิāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāļ™ั้āļ™āļšัāļ™āđ€āļ—ิāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđ€āļ™ื่āļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ§่āļēāđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ™ั้āļ™

    āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āđ€āļāļĄ 1X2 RTP āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™
    āđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļ āļ‰ัāļ™āļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦ็āļ™āļ§่āļēāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ°āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļˆāļ°āļĄāļēāļāļ–ึāļ‡ 1,000x āļŦāļĢืāļ­ 2,000x āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĒāļ­āļ”āđ€āļĒี่āļĒāļĄāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ” āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āļš่āļ­āļĒāļ็āļžāļ­āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āđāļĨ้āļ§āļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļ•่āļģāļĨāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļĒิ่āļ‡āļāļ§่āļēāļ™ั้āļ™āļ”้āļ§āļĒ āđ„āļĄ่āđƒāļŠ่āļ™ัāļāļ›āļĢัāļšāļ›āļĢุāļ‡āļŠāļ™ิāļ”āļ—ี่āđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§ัāļĨāļĄāļēāļāđ„āļĄ่āļ™้āļ­āļĒāđ€āļĨāļĒāļ—ีāđ€āļ”ีāļĒāļ§āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļŠāļĢ้āļēāļ‡āđāļĢāļ‡āļ”āļĨāđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦ้āļœู้āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļē āđāļ•่āļ§่āļēāđ‚āļ™่āļ™āļĄิāđ„āļ”้āļĄีāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ§่āļēāļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āđ„āļĄ่āļ­āļēāļˆāļˆāļ°āļ—āļ­āļ”āļ—ิ้āļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļģāđ„āļĢāļˆāļēāļāļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāđ„āļ”้ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ§่āļēāļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđƒāļŦ้āļāļēāļĢāļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļĨืāļ­āļĄāļēāļāļˆāļēāļāļŸีāļžāļšāļĢ์ .
    IMIWIN
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēimiwin
    IMI WIN
    IMIBET

    ReplyDelete

  32. āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™ิāļ„āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļ„āļĨ็āļ”āļĨัāļš āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ™้āļ­āļĒ āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļĄีāđ„āļĄ่āļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒ āļ็āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļ”้

    āļ›ัāļāļŦāļēāļŠāļģāļ„ัāļāļ—ี่āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āđƒāļ„āļĢāđ†āļœู้āļ„āļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļ āđ„āļĄ่āļāļĨ้āļēāļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āļŦāļĢืāļ­āđ„āļ›āļŠู่āđ‚āļĨāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āđ‚āļ™่āļ™āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ—ี่āļĄีāļˆāļģāļัāļ” āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦ้āļˆัāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļ°āļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļ„āļ§้āļēāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§ัāļĨ āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™ āļ•่āļēāļ‡āļˆāļģāļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļ­āļĒāđ„āļ› āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ™้āļ­āļĒ āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāđāļš่āļ‡āļŠāļĢāļĢāđāļš่āļ‡āļŠ่āļ§āļ™ āļ­ัāļ•āļĢāļēāļĢāļēāļĒāļˆ่āļēāļĒāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ§ัāļ™āļ™ี้ asiabet999 āļˆāļ°āļ่āļ­āđƒāļŦ้āļ„ุāļ“āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ– āļĢู้āļˆัāļāļ”้āļēāļ™āļŠู่āđ‚āļĨāļāļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āđ„āļ”้āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„ุāļ“āđ„āļĄ่āļ—āļĢāļēāļšāļĄāļēāļ่āļ­āļ™ āļĻึāļāļĐāļēāđ€āļĨ่āļēāđ€āļĢีāļĒāļ™āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™ āļ”้āļ§āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļˆัāļ”āļŠāļĢāļĢāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļ—ุāļ™ āļˆāļ°āļĄีāļœāļĨāđƒāļŦ้āļ„ุāļ“āļšัāļ™āđ€āļ—ิāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđ„āļ›āļัāļš āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์

    āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™ิāļ„āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļ„āļĨ็āļ”āļĨัāļš āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ™้āļ­āļĒ āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ”ิāļ•āļĄีāđ„āļĄ่āļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒ āļ็āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļ”้

    āđ€āļ›ิāļ”āđ€āļœāļĒāđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™ิāļ„āđ€āļ­āļēāļŠāļ™āļ°āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™ āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļ„āļĨ็āļ”āļ§ิāļ˜ี āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ™้āļ­āļĒ
    āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ„āļĢāļēāļ§āđ„āļŦāļ™ āļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļŦāļĢืāļ­āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļĨāļ‡āļ—ุāļ™āļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āđƒāļŠ้āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™ āļ§่āļēāļŠ่āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļˆāļ°āļĄีāļŦāļĢืāļ­āđ€āļ›āļĨ่āļē āļˆāļĢิāļ‡āđ†āļŦāļĄุāļ™āļ§āļ‡āļĨ้āļ­āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āđāļ„่āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āđ„āļĄ่āļี่āļ•āļē āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļĨāļ‡āļ—ุāļ™āļ—ั้āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļ”āļ—ุāļāļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļ็āļŦāļĄāļ” āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļ°āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āđ„āļŦāļĢ่ āļ็āđ„āļĄ่āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļžิ่āļĄāđ€āļ•ิāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļĄ่āđ€āļ‚้āļēāļĢāļ°āļšāļš āļ›ัāļāļŦāļēāļ•่āļēāļ‡āđ†āļžāļ§āļāļ™ี้āļˆāļ°āļŦāļĄāļ”āđ„āļ› āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āļ„ุāļ“āđ„āļ”้āļ—āļĢāļēāļšāļˆāļ°āļัāļšāđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™ āđƒāļ™āđāļšāļšāļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡ āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ™้āļ­āļĒ
    IMIWIN
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēimiwin
    IMI WIN
    IMIBET

    ReplyDelete
  33. ISC888 āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āļ­ัāļ™āļ”ัāļš 1 āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ„āļ—āļĒ āļŠāļĄัāļ„āļĢāļŠāļĄāļēāļŠิāļāļŸāļĢี 300 āļšāļēāļ— āđ„āļĄ่āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļ āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļē āļ­ัāļžāđ€āļ”āļ—āļĨ่āļēāļŠุāļ” 2021 āđāļ­āļ”āđ„āļĨāļ™์ : @newisc888

    ReplyDelete
  34. āđ„āļĄ่āļ§่āļēāļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āļ•ิāļ”āļ•āļēāļĄ āļāļĨุ่āļĄāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• facebook , LINE āļāļĨุ่āļĄāļĨัāļš āļŦāļĢืāļ­āļ§ิāļ˜ีāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ•ิāļ”āļ•่āļ­āļัāļšāļŠāļĄāļēāļŠิāļāļœู้āļžāļ­āđƒāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ”ิāļĄāļžัāļ™āļ”้āļ§āļĒāļัāļ™āđƒāļ™āļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āđƒāļ”āļ็āļ•āļēāļĄāļšāļ­āļāđ„āļ”้āđ€āļĨāļĒāļ§่āļēāļĄัāļ™āļˆāļ°āļĄีāļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļŠāļģāļ„ัāļāļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦ้āļ—ุāļāđ†āļ„āļ™ āļŠāļšāđ‚āļ­āļāļēāļŠāļšāļĢāļĢāļĨุāđ€āļ›้āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļˆāļēāļāļ™ั้āļ™āļ็āđ„āļ”้āļāļģāđ„āļĢāđ„āļ”้āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§ัāļ‡āđ€āļ­āļēāđ„āļ§้āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠ่āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļāđāļĨ้āļ§āļāļĨุ่āļĄāļĨัāļšāđ€āļŦāļĨ่āļēāļ™ี้āļ–ูāļāđƒāļˆāđ„āļĄ่āļŦāļēāļœāļĨāļāļģāđ„āļĢāđƒāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ„ิāļ”āļ„่āļēāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāļ„่āļēāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāđ€āļ™ีāļĒāļĄāļŦāļĢืāļ­āļ„่āļēāļ„āļ­āļĄāļĄิāļŠāļŠั่āļ™āļ­āļ°āđ„āļĢāļ–ืāļ­āļ§่āļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠุāļˆāļĢิāļ•āđƒāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœู้āļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ—ี่āļĄีāļ•่āļ­āļัāļ™ āļ•่āļēāļ‡āļ‚้āļēāļ‡āļ•่āļēāļ‡āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļĨืāļ­āđāļĨāļ°āļ­ุāļ”āļŦāļ™ุāļ™āđƒāļŦ้āļ—ุāļāđ†āļ„āļ™āļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ„āļ”้āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļŠāļ§ัāļŠāļ”ิāļ āļēāļžāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāđ€āļĢ็āļˆ āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļœāļĨāļāļģāđ„āļĢāļŠูāļ‡āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§ัāļ‡āđ€āļ­āļēāđ„āļ§้

    IMI WIN
    imi8win
    imi9win

    ReplyDelete
  35. āđ€āļāļĄāļŠ์āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•
    Money Train 2 āđāļŠāļ”āļ‡
    āļ—ี่ Slots Temple āļ„ุāļ“āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļŦāļĄุāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđāļŠāļ”āļ‡ Money Train 2 āļ‹ึ่āļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠ่āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—ี่āļ”ีāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđ€āļžื่āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢู้āļˆัāļāđ€āļāļĄāļ™ี้āļ”้āļ§āļĒāļ•ัāļ§āļ„ุāļ“āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļŸāļĢี āļŠิ่āļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļģāļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ™ัāļ™āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļ”ัāļšāļ—ี่āđƒāļāļĨ้āđ€āļ„ีāļĒāļ‡āļัāļšāļŠิ่āļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„ุāļ“āļžāļ™ัāļ™āļ–้āļēāļ„ุāļ“āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļˆāļĢิāļ‡ āļ„ุāļ“āļ„āļ§āļĢāļˆāļ°āļĢāļ°āļšุāļ‚้āļ­āļˆāļģāļัāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļžāļ™ัāļ™āđ€āļŦāļĄืāļ­āļ™āļัāļ™āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļĄั่āļ™āđƒāļˆāļ§่āļēāđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāļ—ี่āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ„āļ”้āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļ‡āļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĄāļēāļ“āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„ุāļ“āļŠิ่āļ‡āļ™ี้āļŠ่āļ‡āļœāļĨāļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĒิ่āļ‡āļ•่āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļ°āļŠูāļ‡āļŠุāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ™ี้āļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§ัāļĨāļŠูāļ‡āļŠุāļ”āļ—ี่āļ„ุāļ“āļāļģāļĨัāļ‡āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđƒāļ™ Money Cart 2: Bonus Reels āļĄีāđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āđāļ•่ 5,000 āđ€āļ—่āļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēts911
    ts911

    ReplyDelete
  36. āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• xo āđ€āļāļĄāļŠ์ āđ„āļŦāļ™ āļ”ี āđ‚āļšāļ™ัāļŠ āđāļ•āļ āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢั้āļ‡ āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĄั่āļ‡āļĄีāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ­āļ‡
    Title
    December 24, 2021
    āļŦāļēāļāļ§่āļēāļ„ุāļ“āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ€āļĨิāļĻāđƒāļ™āđāļŸāļ™āđ†āļ„่āļēāļĒ XO āļŦ้āļēāļĄāļžāļĨāļēāļ”āđ€āļĨāļĒāđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ§่āļēāļ§ัāļ™āļ™ี้āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āļĄāļēāđ€āļŠāļ™āļ­āđāļ™āļ°āļัāļ™āļ§่āļē āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• xo āđ€āļāļĄāļŠ์ āđ„āļŦāļ™ āļ”ี āđ‚āļšāļ™ัāļŠ āđāļ•āļ āļš่āļ­āļĒāļ„āļĢั้āļ‡ āđƒāļŦ้āļ—่āļēāļ™āđ„āļ”้āđƒāļŠ้āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ‚āļĒāļŠāļ™์āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŦāļēāļัāļ™āđ„āļ”้āđ€āļĨāļĒāđāļ„่āđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āļ­่āļēāļ™āđ€āļ™ื้āļ­āļŦāļēāļ™ี้āđƒāļŦ้āļˆāļšāļĒืāļ™āļĒัāļ™āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”้āđ€āļāļĄāļ™่āļēāļ”ึāļ‡āļ”ูāļ”āđ„āļ›āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđƒāļ™āđ€āļ§็āļšāļ­ีāļāđ€āļĒāļ­āļ° āđ€āļ™ื่āļ­āļ‡āļˆāļēāļāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ™ี้ āļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ•āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„่āļēāļĒāļ™ี้āļ­āļ­āļāļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ™ิāļĒāļĄāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļāđƒāļ™āļ•āļĨāļēāļ”āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ

    āđāļĄ้āļāļĢāļ°āļ™ั้āļ™āļ็āļĄิāđ„āļ”้āļĄีāļ”ีāđ€āļžีāļĒāļ‡āđāļ„่āđ‚āļšāļ™ัāļŠāđāļ•āļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢั้āļ‡āļ™āļ°āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļŠāļĨ็āļ­āļ• xo āđ€āļāļĄāļŠ์ āđ„āļŦāļ™ āļ”ี āđ‚āļšāļ™ัāļŠ āđāļ•āļ āļš่āļ­āļĒāļĄāļēāļ āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ§่āļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ„่āļēāļĒāļĄีāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢัāļšāļ›āļĢุāļ‡āļ”้āļēāļ™āđ€āļ§็āļšāđƒāļŦ้āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļĢāļ­āļ‡āļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠ้āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœู้āđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—ี่āļĄāļēāļāļ‚ึ้āļ™ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļัāļšāļ•ั้āļ‡āļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļšāļĢิāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŦ้āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđ„āļ›āļ•āļēāļĄāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļŠāļēāļāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļēāļŠิāđ‚āļ™āļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āđ€āļžื่āļ­āļĨูāļāļ„้āļēāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŠุāļ‚āđāļĨāļ°āļ็āļ–ูāļāđƒāļˆāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āļĄāļēāđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļ§็āļš āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–ึāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”็āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļ āļ–āļ­āļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ§็āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•์āļ็āđƒāļŠ้āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāđ€āļ‚้āļēāļĄāļēāļŠ่āļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦ้āđ„āļĄ่āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŠีāļĒāđ€āļ§āļĨ่āļģāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļัāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœ่āļēāļ™āļ„āļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļ™ี้āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļŠุāļ‚āđƒāļˆāđ„āļ”้āđ€āļĨāļĒāđ€āļĄื่āļ­āļĄāļēāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļัāļšāđ€āļ§็āļšāđ€āļĢื่āļ­āļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļŦ่āļ§āļ‡āđ€āļĨāļĒāļ็āļ„ืāļ­āļˆāļ°āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđ„āļŦāļ™āļ”ีāđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āđ€āļ§็āļšāđ„āļ‹āļ•์āđāļŦ่āļ‡āļ™ี้āđ€āļāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒ

    IMIWIN
    imiwin
    imiwin

    ReplyDelete
  37. āļœู้āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ัāļ§āļĢ์āļ™āļēāđ€āļĄāļ™āļ•์āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļœ่āļēāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“์āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļ—ี่āđ€āļ„āļĢีāļĒāļ”āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡āđ„āļ”้
    āļŠิ่āļ‡āļ—ี่āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ‰āļēāļāđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļ™ั้āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĢีāļĒāļ”āļ™้āļ­āļĒāļāļ§่āļēāļāļēāļĢāļžāļĒāļēāļĒāļēāļĄāļ›ั่āļ™āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ัāļ§āļĢ์āļ™āļēāđ€āļĄāļ™āļ•์āļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļŠāļĄ่āļģāđ€āļŠāļĄāļ­ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļœู้āļĢิāđ€āļĢิ่āļĄ āļĢāļ°āļ”ัāļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļ™ั้āļ™āļ•่āļģāļĨāļ‡āļĒิ่āļ‡āļāļ§่āļēāļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒ

    āđāļĄ้āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ­ีāđ€āļ§āļ™āļ•์āļšāļēāļĒāļ­ิāļ™āļ•่āļģāļ—ี่āļĄีāļ›āļĨāļēāđ€āļĒāļ­āļ°āļĄāļēāļ āđāļĄ้āļāļĢāļ°āļ™ั้āļ™āļ„ุāļ“āļ็āļšāļēāļ‡āļ—ีāļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāļĢāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”้āļ•่āļ­āļŠั่āļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡āļ™้āļ­āļĒāļāļ§่āļēāļ–้āļēāļŦāļēāļāļ„ุāļ“āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ” āļ”้āļ§āļĒāđ€āļŦāļ•ุāļœāļĨāļ”ัāļ‡āļāļĨ่āļēāļ§ āļĒāļāđ€āļ§้āļ™āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļ°āđ€āļŠื่āļ­āļĄั่āļ™āđƒāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢู้āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚้āļēāđƒāļˆāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ•āļēāļĢāļēāļ‡āļ—้āļēāļĒāļ—ี่āļŠุāļ”āđƒāļ™āļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļģāļ„ัāļ āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļˆāļ°āļŠāļĢ้āļēāļ‡āļāļģāđ„āļĢāļ—ี่āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāļĄ่āđ„āļ”้āļĄāļēāļāļ‚ึ้āļ™
    āđāļ•่ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ัāļ§āļĢ์āļ™āļēāđ€āļĄāļ™āļ•์āđ€āļ›็āļ™āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ—ี่āļ”ีāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļģāļ„āļ°āđāļ™āļ™āļŠัāļĒāļ„āļĢั้āļ‡āļŠāļģāļ„ัāļ āđāļĨ้āļ§āļ็āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļŠ่āļ§āļĒāļ§ัāļ”āļĢāļ°āļ”ัāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ™āļēāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„ุāļ“āđ„āļ”้

    āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ—āļģāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđ„āļ”้āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§่āļēāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āļĨāļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļ›๊āļāđ€āļāļ­āļĢ์āļŦāļĢืāļ­āđ€āļ›āļĨ่āļē?
    āđƒāļŠ่ āđāļĄ้āļāļĢāļ°āļ™ั้āļ™āļŠิ่āļ‡āļ—ี่āļ•āļĢāļ‡āļัāļ™āļ‚้āļēāļĄāļšāļēāļ‡āļ—ีāļ­āļēāļˆāđƒāļŠ้āđ„āļ”้āļัāļšāļœู้āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ี่āđ‚āļŠāļ„āļ”ีāļšāļēāļ‡āļšุāļ„āļ„āļĨ āļœู้āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āļ—ั่āļ§āđ†āđ„āļ›āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļˆāļ°āļĄāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦ็āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļĨุāļœāļĨāļ—ี่āļš่āļ­āļĒāļĄāļēāļāļĒิ่āļ‡āļ‚ึ้āļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ€āļāļĄāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļ”

    āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āļ„ุāļ“āļ§ิ่āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļ™āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđāļ‚่āļ‡āļ‚āļ™āļēāļ”āđƒāļŦāļ่ āļ„ุāļ“āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™āļ—ี่āļˆāļ°āļ•้āļ­āļ‡āđ‚āļŠāļ„āļ”ีāļš่āļ­āļĒāđ€āļิāļ™āđ„āļ›āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļŠิ่āļ‡āļ—ี่āļ„ุāļ“āļ–ูāļāđƒāļˆ
    IMIBET
    imi win
    imiwin

    ReplyDelete
  38. āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ‹ื้āļ­āļĨāļ­āļ•āđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢี่ Keno
    āļĄāļēāļ–ึāļ‡āļ‚ั้āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđƒāļŦ้āđ„āļ”้āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļĄāļēāļāļĒิ่āļ‡āļāļ§่āļēāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ”āļē āđ€āļžิ่āļĄāļŠ่āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āļ°āđ€āļĒāļ­āļ°āļ‚ึ้āļ™ āļĨāļģāļ”ัāļšāđāļĢāļāđ€āļĨāļĒāļ—ี่āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļģāļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļģāđ€āļŠāļĄāļ­āđ€āļĄื่āļ­āđ€āļ‚้āļēāđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”ิāļĄāļžัāļ™āđāļšāļšāļ­āļ­āļ™āđ„āļĨāļ™์ āļ็āļ„ืāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ›้āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ่āļ­āļ™āļˆāļ°āļĄีāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠ้āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ™ั่āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āļˆāļģāļัāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļ—ี่āļ›āļĢāļēāļĢāļ–āļ™āļēāļĨāļ‡āļ—ุāļ™āđƒāļŦ้āđ„āļĄ่āļĄāļēāļāļĄāļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āđ„āļĄ่āļ™้āļ­āļĒāļˆāļ™āļ–ึāļ‡āđ€āļิāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļˆāļģāđ€āļ›็āļ™ āđāļĨ้āļ§āļ็āļŦāļĒุāļ”āđ€āļĨ่āļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ—ัāļ™āļ—ีāđ€āļĄื่āļ­āđ„āļ”้āļĢัāļšāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§ัāļĨāļ—ี่āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļ›āļĢāļēāļĢāļ–āļ™āļēāđāļšāļšāļžāļ­āļ”ีāļŠāļĄāļัāļšāļĨัāļāļĐāļ“āļ°āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāļĄ āļ–้āļēāļŦāļēāļāļĄีāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢู้āļŠึāļāļ§่āļēāļˆāļģāļ•้āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļāđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ„āļĢāļēāļ§āļ•่āļ­āđ„āļ› āđƒāļŦ้āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļģāļāļēāļĢāļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āđ€āļ‡ิāļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”ิāļĄāļžัāļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļš Keno āļ™ี้āļ™ั่āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢัāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”ิāļĄāļžัāļ™āđāļšāļšāļ—āļēāļĒāļœāļĨāđƒāļŦ้āļŠāļ™āļ°āđƒāļ™āđāļšāļšāļ­āļĒ่āļēāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļĒāļĄีāļˆุāļ”āđ€āļ”่āļ™āļ•āļĢāļ‡āļ—ี่āļāļēāļĢāļšัāļ™āļ—ึāļāļœāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ­āļāļĢāļēāļ‡āļ§ัāļĨāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ­āļšāļ่āļ­āļ™āļŦāļ™้āļē āļžāļ§āļāđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āļ™āļģāļœāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ­āļāļĢāļēāļ‡
    ts911
    āļ—āļēāļ‡āđ€āļ‚้āļēts911

    ReplyDelete

Commenting policy:

All comments are welcome here. I refuse to censor points of view that differ from my own.

I recognize that I may be challenging the deep-seated beliefs of some people, and perhaps stirring up emotions in others. However, I would ask:

- if you care to respond to anything that I have said, please do not simply link to or quote some statistic. Do not simply regurgitate things you have been told are true. Think about what I am saying. Respond with an argument. Offer something from your personal observations, and explain to me how you feel your statistic is connected to your experience.

- If you wish to be part of a discussion, try not to dismiss what I or a another commenter says out of hand. Yes, that means that some lines of thought or ideologies may not stand up to scrutiny (perhaps even my own).

- Remember, ad hominem attacks diminish everyone involved. If you want to criticize anything, do so passionately and directly - but debate is about attacking ideas, not people.

Have at you!