Sunday, 25 March 2012

okay, getting my shit together...

I promised to post text versions of my videos here ages ago, and I'm just getting around to it now. I'm going to start with the most recent and work my way backwards, just to make things extra difficult for all of you.

So here goes:

The invisible man riding the donkey backwards

Okay, someone sent me a link to an article in The Atlantic, called "What's Wrong with the Violence Against Women Act". Now I suppose I could pick apart the article, confirm many of its points, and examine what it leaves out of its analysis, but I didn't get further than the sub-heading, which reads as follows:

"A bill that was designed to rectify gender discrimination tips the balance too far, putting accused men at an unfair disadvantage."

There is so much wrong with that sentence, I don't even know where to start. Oh wait, actually I do.

The bill was never designed to rectify gender discrimination. It was designed to increase the gender discrimination that already existed. Believing that there was gender discrimination AGAINST women in domestic violence law and in society's attitude toward it, is to essentially rewrite women's history, and to utterly ignore men's.

Up until the early 1700s in the UK, there existed archaic laws regarding husband's discretion to physically chastise their wives. By this law, a husband was permitted to give his wife "mild correction", and I think it's important to note that this law existed because a husband was legally answerable for his wife's actions. If she committed a public crime or misdeed--stole from or assaulted someone, for instance, or even gambled away the family fortune--it was her husband who was held to account, legally, financially and socially. This law afforded him the power of correction "within reasonable bounds" and actually prohibited husbands from using violence.

A couple of things:

I'd guess that, considering the nature of the culture back then, how common corporal punishment was wrt children (not just by parents), convicted criminals, servants and apprentices, etc, the 1720s definition of "violence" is a probably a little different from our definition today, and the 1720s definition of it within the context of domestic violence--wherein current definitions include "not speaking to your wife" or "using logic"--will have been VERY different indeed.

Considering a husband was answerable for his wife's behavior in public and any wrongs or crimes she might commit against others, forbidding him ANY means of holding her accountable to HIM would have been an egregious imbalance of power within the institution of marriage. The law equally afforded men the right to correct the behavior of any individual for whom he was held legally answerable--children and apprentices, for instance.

And finally, before anyone pounces on the idea that men were answerable for their wive's behavior because men were in authority over their wives, and that this authority was a benefit given them by the system in order to oppress women, I'm going flip the sequence of that line of thought around.

Instead of "marriage is an institution to oppress women for men's benefit" therefore "husbands have authority over their wives" therefore "men are answerable for their wives since they could order those wives to do bad things", I'm going to posit a different sequence of logic based on a different primary assumption. "Marriage was an institution designed to serve children and protect women" therefore "women were entitled to the protection of their husbands" therefore "men must stand as a shield between their wives and the violence of the rest of the world, including that of the law" therefore "men must have authority over their wives." That is, if a man must be answerable for his wife in order to protect her from the consequences of even her own actions, then she should at the very least be answerable to HIM.

Why would I posit this sequence based on this different starting point? Because there were laws limiting what husbands were legally permitted to do to the women under their authority. Not just physically, but financially as well. Laws like [privy examination] also existed to protect women from financial abuse by their husbands. The law of [privy examination] required a woman who owned property and wanted to sell it--say, a house she had brought with her into a marriage--to be interviewed outside her husband's presence by a legal official to determine that she really did want to sell it, and that her husband was not forcing her to do so.

And I'd also posit this because lifelong marriage itself is a raw deal for men--a man's value in the sexual marketplace often increases with age, as he accumulates wealth and social status, while a woman's ALWAYS decreases and eventually fizzles to nothing long before she'll die of old age.

In a "male-dominated" society where marriage really WAS designed to oppress women for the benefit of men, it would have been legally easy, socially acceptable and even encouraged for a man to divorce his wife the moment her youth and beauty faded, if he could trade her in for someone better. Maybe a LOT better considering he'd have had a decade or two to acquire more wealth, and considering he owned his children, who could have contributed to that wealth in an age of child labor.

And frankly, the entire notion that marriage is the equivalent of female oppression and slavery is belied by the hand-wringing from pundits across the political spectrum clamoring that women want husbands and men aren't doing their duty and dragging themselves to the altar. If marriage is a form of slavery for WOMEN, why is it women who still desire marriage? And if it's an institution devised to benefit men, why is it MEN who are avoiding it like the plague?

So I think it's reasonable to assume that in the past, a man was expected to stand as a shield between his wife and the dangers of the world, even when those dangers were posed by the legal or criminal consequences of her own actions. Does ANYONE believe it would be remotely fair to hand a man the job of bodyguard and handler, to hold him accountable not only for the safety but the behavior of his charge, and then give him no means to enforce his judgment on that charge? To say to him, "If this person is harmed, you will be held accountable for it, and if they commit a crime, you will be punished for it, but oh, by the way, they don't have to do one damn thing you say"?

As early as 1768, when Lord Blackstone, gathered up all the assorted laws of England into one big compendium, it was made clear that physical violence and even physical restraint by husbands against wives was in violation of the law, though he noted it was common for such violations among the underclass to be swept under the judicial rug. Perhaps because female members of the underclass would be more likely to find themselves on the wrong side of the law, male members of the underclass spent more hours a day performing labor and therefore had less time to supervise the behavior of their wives, and all members were subject to hand-to-mouth living that meant jailing a battering husband would subject his wife to financial destitution?

Likewise, in the US, there have been laws against wife-battering since before the American Revolution, and by 1870 it was officially illegal in nearly every state. I have only heard of one gender neutral domestic violence law in this period--Massachusetts Bay Colony's law of 1655. Even prior to the drafting of these laws, wife-batterers could be and were, in fact, arrested and penalized for abusing their wives using the simple criminal charge of assault and battery. Punishments for wife-beating included 40 lashes at the public whipping post, fines ranging from $255 to $1000, and sentences of 1 to 5 years in prison.

Moreover, male family members, neighbors, and members of religious congregations were known to enact vigilante justice on wife-beaters--sometimes beating them, abducting and whipping them, or even running them out of town. Even in accounts I have read from feminist sources that include excerpts from women's diaries, there is often a male relative or family friend who steps in and removes the battered woman from her batterer's immediate presence, or even from his household, when serious abuse was witnessed.

And before anyone jumps in and claims that these protections and restrictions were based not on gender but on the power imbalance between those who had authority over others (husbands) and those who were under their power (wives), I'm going to call bullshit.

Because, we have a perfect example of a huge, socially and legally systemic ungendered power imbalance in history wherein women received protections that equally powerless and vulnerable men did not--slavery.

In France and Spain, in the early days of slavery, provisions in the slave code existed to protect pregnant and sick women from physical abuse. Other legal amendments prohibited sexual use or abuse of female slaves by slave owners--wrt both rape by owners and pimping.

In the 19th century, Britain introduced laws to limit the types of punishment allowed wrt slave women, forbidding punishing one in public, restricting the number of lashes she could receive, and prohibiting any physical punishment for pregnant slave women.

And though enforcement of these laws probably left a lot to be desired, no such protections existed for male slaves to be enforced or not.

Only 2/3 as many slave women were brought over to the European colonies as slave men, however, in many colonies females outnumbered males--because they lived longer. I wonder why?

Keep in mind, too, that even when I was a kid, children were still receiving corporal punishment in some schools--including caning. So attitudes toward physical punishment were VERY different from what they are today--yet wives and even female slaves had legal protections that prohibited those in authority over them from going too far, while men had no such protections.

Nor were they protected in ANY way from the violence of their wives. In fact, when a man was battered by his wife, the community held him answerable for THAT, too. In France, when neighbors discovered a man in their community was being dominated or beaten by his wife, he was paraded around town while seated backwards on a donkey holding its tail, while the crowd ridiculed him. In England, battered men were routinely strapped to carts and subjected to the derision and mockery of the community. Essentially punished for the abuse they suffered at the hands of their wives--abuse, I might add, that had no legally codified limits or restrictions in most jurisdictions.

And while many experts have attributed this treatment to a kind of blind adherence to the patriarchal norm of "husband as lord of his household", and systemic vilification and contempt for weak men that still goes on today, when you look a little deeper, it's not quite so simple.

Life was a lot harsher back then, and as I've said before, when life in a community is harsh, things like individual wellbeing, safety and fulfillment tend to take a back seat to more important things like social cohesion and collective survivalism.

Back then, when a woman married there was only one legal entity to which a she was fully answerable--her husband. A woman who beat her husband was seen as a HUGE threat to the stability of the community. Here was a woman capable of defying the socially enforced and legally endorsed norm of husbandly authority, a breaker of social and legal taboos. If such a woman--one already predisposed to ignore the rules of society--got up to malicious or harmful behavior outside the home, there was no way for the community to hold her personally accountable for her actions. That was her husband's job, and clearly he couldn't be trusted with it.

If she committed a crime, her husband might even be sent to prison for it, and if that happened, what little external constraint there'd been on her behavior--her husband's authority--would be out of the picture entirely. She would, in effect, be free to wreak havoc in the community, a socially irresponsible woman who is answerable to none.

Forcing a man to ride the donkey backwards served a couple of purposes within the community. For one, it put other men on notice, reminding them how important it was to social cohesion for them to exercise authority within their households and control misbehaving wives. Any man watching or participating in such a spectacle would be reminded just what things would be like for him if he failed the community in the same way this poor chump did. And secondly, it essentially stripped the battered man of respect and social status within the community, which was a consequence his wife--who shared in the respect and social status of her husband--could not avoid. She could not be punished directly for her behavior, but she could be punished through the public humiliation of her husband, and the decrease in her own social status that accompanied it. If the contempt of the community extended to such things as, for instance, job loss, she'd be forced to live with that consequence as well.

A few things have changed since those days, when it comes to battered husbands. The elaborate rituals of public ridicule are gone, but men are, by and large, still held accountable for the abuse they suffer, and women excused for their misbehavior within marriage. There exists little outreach or assistance for such men, because Patriarchy Theory and its twisting of reality fooled everyone into believing battered husbands could not possibly exist. Female batterers are still not held fully accountable for their behavior, nor does the community intervene the way it always has when men were horribly abused by their wives--we instead expect individual men to deal with the problem on their own.

Legislation and arrest policies are more biased than they ever were, but it's no longer because we see men as a shield between their wives and the violence of the rest of the world, even the violence of the law. It's because we've been fooled into believing that marriage was an institution designed to oppress rather than protect and support women. We've been tricked into believing marriage was always a raw deal for women and a great one for men, despite the fact that single motherhood--which is a struggle even now--would have been a one-way ticket to extreme poverty for 99% of women through history, and despite the fact that its lifelong component was designed to keep men from abandoning their wives after menopause, rather than the other way around.

We've been tricked into believing the job of a husband was to be a bully rather than a bodyguard, and that "male-dominated" societies are oppressive to women because hey, when men are in charge they will always act in ways that benefit men without ever considering the wellbeing of women. We've been fooled into thinking the extra rights and freedoms men had were cookies given to them "just because they were men" rather than because women were biologically vulnerable and dependent on men, and giving men those extra rights and freedoms enabled them to do the job society expected of them--to support and protect women.

We've been fooled into thinking the authority society gave husbands within marriage was a means to oppress women, rather than a necessary component of men's expectation to protect them, even from the consequences of their own actions. We've been tricked into believing the exception--the husband who used his authority to victimize and cruelly abuse his wife--was the rule.

We've been fooled into believing the battered husband is a time-honored and well-worn comic trope that makes appearances in Bugs Bunny cartoons on Sunday mornings, because it has always been RARE, rather than because it defies our internal gendered narrative of women as harmless and deserving of protection and our expectation on men to be strong and capable of taking care of and protecting themselves as well as others.

We've been bamboozled into believing that domestic violence against women was NEVER considered a crime until feminism arrived to enlighten us, and that it was ALWAYS socially acceptable, despite tons of historical evidence to the contrary. And the safer the world gets and the less directly dependent on individual men women become for their support and protection, the easier it is for us to believe that men are brutes and abusers by nature, and the easier it is for us to toss them in the trash when they're abused.

We don't even have to notice them anymore.

Because before the age of the pill, child support enforcement, subsidized daycare, safe streets, welfare benefits and safe, easy indoor jobs, the task of protecting and providing for women...well, that necessary task fell to individual men and it necessitated keeping those individual men around to do that job.

Whereas 200 years ago, the community could not afford to pretend a battered husband did not exist, well...we've come a long way, baby, and arrived at a point in our social evolution where society, rather than individual men, can do the job of supporting women and protecting them from harm, even when that harm arises from their own actions, and where battered men, instead of being subjected to ritualized humiliations, are essentially invisible to everyone, even when they're standing right in front of us, because we can afford not to care about them one way or the other.

By defying our gendered assumptions, battered men make us so uncomfortable we'll recast them as abusers themselves whenever we possibly can, and when we can't, we'd rather close our eyes and stick our fingers in our ears when they beg for help, than acknowledge their existence. And when even the people who are smart enough to realize that VAWA is the equivalent of gender apartheid are laboring under the misperception that historical laws and social attitudes about domestic violence discriminated against WOMEN, is it any wonder that it's so fucking easy for the rest of society to sweep all those male victims under the rug?


  1. Hmm. You look good on video but I still prefer text so thanks for this.

    I disagree with your characterisation of the situation with femme couvert as being the man expected to protect women even against the law. Now I notice that in the text version you have that phrase in quotes. Is it a quotation and if so from where?

    "men must stand as a shield between their wives and the violence of the rest of the world, including that of the law"

    My view of this would be that the law just didn't have the time and resources to police everyone directly as it does these days. As a result the law was created with the aim of policing heads of households (men usually). This goes much wider than domestic situations. The entire law is gendered to be against men and not really notice or bother with women.

    As the law and government became better funded and "bigger" (as I guess you libertarians would say it) then it started dealing directly with women and even children, but the system that had been built up to constrain men, continued to be gendered. Women were dealt with but chiefly when they broke the law as if they were a man.

    This makes more sense to me than saying that society somehow wanted men to protect women from the law. The law was already the voice of society and it could (and was) designed to protect women already. Women didn't need protection from the law, and if it was felt that new protections for women in law were needed they would and were enacted.

    Also: I think femme couvert largely did NOT apply for criminal cases? Certainly a woman who let's say committed murder would be arrested and hanged for it not her husband. I see that as the law saying, OK we don't have time to deal with all these women and children but if it's a really serious case like murder then sure, we have time to deal with that.

    So the husband actually protected her least when the law was reaching for the wife the most as it were.


    1. For More Cute Girls Images And Wallpapers Please Go To - ImageTechBuzz.In

      If You Love This Site, Please Bookmark This Links After Opening It.
      Click Ctrl+D To Bookmark
      Nice collection of Pictures, Here You Get More If You Click. Thanks :)

      Innocent Cute Girl Beautiful Photo
      Beautiful Pretty Smile Indian Desi Teen Girl
      Charming Eye Girl Aiman Khan Selfie
      Hot Indian Desi Girl Sexy Body Figure Photo
      Indian Desi GIrl Showing Her Sexy Navel

      _♥♥CLICK HERE♥♥♥♥
      ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ CLICK HERE ♥♥♥♥♥♥
      _______♥♥♥♥♥ CLICK HERE ♥♥♥♥♥♥

  2. @DavidByron

    Why would you assume the law didn't have enough resources to go after women and children? And if a wife committed a crime, whats the difference of going after her rather than the husband?


    I should warn you of claiming that women were not held accountable in courts on criminal matters. Googling around, there seems to be serious problems with this. (Note: sorry if I'm misunderstanding what's in the video)

    Anyhow, take a look at this:

    Unfortunately, this is no the whole book, but it does have what I feel is very significant research to contribute. It is a record of "petty violence" (non-murder) in early-modern London. Specifically, take a look at the introduction. The author points out serious oversights -and reluctance- by historians to look at women as perpetrators, or that they were empowered as victims to prosecute their attackers.

    Interestingly, even he seems be reluctant to challenge feminist scholars:
    "I should note here that my emphasis upon women being empowered as assault prosecutors also needs to be set against the backdrop of scholarship that recognizes women’s lower position in early modern society. We must
    acknowledge that female prosecutors’ likelihood of being believed and vindicated was in no way assured. Indeed, their prosecutions of rape and husbandly violence faced overwhelming obstacles, launched as they were in a
    society where sexual double standards and ideas of the appropriateness of physical chastisement of wives existed in varying degrees. In fact, feminist historiography
    has recognized the importance of female resistance to patriarchal aggression—in the words of one scholar, “without such activity by women, complex mechanisms of male control over women would be superfluous.” It is not surprising, then, that more studies have been done on the areas where these complex gendered values have disempowered women."

    From our point of view, this could be a large bias on his part, and a major crack in Patriarchy theory. I'd love to hear your take on this.

  3. Words in quotation marks need to have a source. I literally have no idea who or from what you are quoting. This seriously weakens your position, as your points are not backed up by anything but your say-so. Please give us some citations.

  4. Although most of this is fully in keeping with most of what I've read about history, I would agree that (pain in the butt though it may be) some citations would be helpful.

    This is otherwise a masterpiece.

    1. Sorry, the sources were posted on the YouTube version, but I didn't bother to C&P them here. :)

    2. Testimony On How My Life was Transform through the help of a God-sent Lender..

      Hello everyone, I am Kathie Roper by name, am writing this Testimony because am really grateful for what Mason Diego did for me and my family, when I thought there was no hope he came and make my family feel alive again by lending us loan at a very low interest rate of 2%. Well I have been searching for a loan to settle my debts for the past three months all I met scammed and took my money until I finally met a God sent Lender. I never thought that there are still genuine loan lenders on the internet but to my greatest surprise i got my loan without wasting much time so if you are out there looking for a loan of any amount i would advise you to email Mr Diego via email: { } and be free of internet scams. thanks... Kathie Roper from California, USA.

  5. Suggestion: why not take the image of the man riding the donkey backwards and post it here?

  6. Quality of our products and service are essential for us. We receive our pharmaceutical products from the popular and well reputed manufacturers adhering to quality standards and leading in the research and quality for example Ajanta.
    100 sildamax tablets

  7. We are focused on the satisfaction of our customers. We provide the lowest price sildamax medicine that you can hardly find any other place. Moreover refund policy is also applied if the customers are not satisfied with our products.
    Sildamax | Buy Sildamax | Buy sildamax uk

  8. At we understand and value the needs of our customers. From tanning to shining white skin, we are aimed to help our customers from the moment they order our products. As soon as the orders are placed, we start processing them and endeavor to dispatch the products on the same day they are ordered.
    Melanotan 2| Melanotan2| Melanotan 2 uk

  9. has shrived to set benchmark in excellence for the retail peptide and chemical industry. We treat every customer with the same superior level of attention and service.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan2 | Melanotan 2 uk

  10. has established itself as one of the leading suppliers of Melanotan peptides by offering the excellent quality peptides at the nominal cost.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan uk| Melanotan 2 uk

  11. We follow one aim to provide value of money for insomnia products with worthy information about what is the product, how it should be taken and possible dose.
    Zopiclone | Buy Zopiclone | Zopiclone Uk

  12. is the UK’s leading health website providing valuable information and quality insomnia products to help people overcome sleep disorders.
    Sleeping Pill Store | Cheap Sleeping Pill Store | Sleeping Pill Store Uk

  13. Growth hormone uk has emerged with an objective to serve for wellness of people with high quality medical products made by the international leading brands.
    Growth Hormone UK | Growth Hormone | hgh for sale

  14. We provide the lowest price sildamax medicine that you can hardly find any other place. Moreover refund policy is also applied if the customers are not satisfied with our products.
    Sildamax | Buy Sildamax Uk |Cheap Sildamax UK

  15. Sildamax is a proven and effective treatment for male erectile dysfunction that works by increasing the blood flow to the penis.
    Sildamax |Buy 100 Sildamax Tablets - Sildamax Now

  16. 100 Kamagra Tablets contains sildenafil citrate compound that is proven to prevent the decomposition of cGMP compounds in the penile organ of males.
    Kamagra | 100 Kamagra Tablets - Sildamax Now

  17. has strived to set benchmark in excellence for the retail peptide and chemical industry. We treat every customer with the same superior level of attention and service.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan2 | Melanotan 2 uk

  18. Melanotan 2 and other peptides are not produced for being used as food additives, drugs, vitamins, supplements, cosmetic or any other unsuitable purposes.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan 2 uk |Buy Melanotan 2 UK

  19. is an expert and consistent supplier of drugs online. We have established excellent relationship with our suppliers that enable us to have quality .
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra | Cheap Kamagra UK

  20. only supply non-restricted kamagra medicines that we receive from the authenticated and reputed manufacturers such as Ajanta Pharma.
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra UK | Cheap Kamagra UK

  21. Kamagra discounts strives to keep and enhance every aspect of our business and meet the ends needs of our customers well. Products at our site are 100% ready for delivery.
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra uk | Cheap Kamagra UK

  22. Men looking for sex power enhancing pills should try Kamagra tab for men. Loaded with active ingredients, Kamagra are perfect for treating those men who suffer from inability on bed.
    kamagra | kamagra online |Buy Kamagra | Cheap Kamagra

  23. Sildamax tablets are becoming a very popular treatment for male impotency and are beginning to compete for market share against the popular brands Viagra and Kamagra.
    Sildamax | Buy Sildamax |Cheap Sildamax UK

  24. Hygetropin is well suited for building muscles, loss body fat, increase energy, endurance, improve the immune system, normalize the blood pressure.
    Hygetropin | Hygetropin UK | Buy Hygetropin UK

  25. In case pancreas system is unable to produce insulin in the body then this medicine is highly recommended to control the sugar level.
    Insulin | Buy Insulin | Insulin UK

  26. The medicine effectively stimulates the linear tissue growth and enables the children and teenagers to grow naturally. It improves metabolism to decrease the fat deposition in the body.
    Jintropin| Jintropin UK | Buy Jintropin UK

  27. Kigtropin is prepared to provide the several advantages such as decrease wrinkles and cellulite, increase muscle mass, loss body fat and weight loss.
    Kigtropin | Kigtropin UK | Buy Kigtropin UK

  28. Somatropin contains active sequence of 191 amino acid, sole chain of polypeptide. It works on increasing the body growth specifically in kids and adolescences.
    Somatropin |Somatropin UK | Buy Somatropin UK

  29. Hygetropin helps in increasing height in the kids and adolescents. It also increases the calcium retention capacity, strengthens body and increases the mineralization of bone.
    Hygetropin | Hygetropin UK | Buy Hygetropin UK

  30. Insulin is produced by pancreas that enables your body to use sugar from carbohydrates in the food to store it for future use. Insulin keeps maintained sugar level.
    Insulin | Buy Insulin | Insulin UK

  31. Insulin is produced by pancreas that enables your body to use sugar from carbohydrates in the food to store it for future use. Insulin keeps maintained sugar level.
    Insulin | Buy Insulin | Insulin UK

  32. Jintropin is produced by the recognized medicine manufacturer Gene Science Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. It is the best strengthening hormone product that is popular in the market today.
    Jintropin | Jintropin UK | Buy Jintropin UK

  33. Kigtropin has several benefits to patients such as increasing memory, bone density and vision. It helps in decreasing fat accumulation in the body and increases protein synthesis for muscle buildup.
    Kigtropin | Kigtropin UK | Buy Kigtropin UK

  34. Riptropin is a popular medicine for increasing the body growth rate. It gives a way to supply natural growth hormone for people who are suffering from deficient level of growth hormone.
    Riptropin | Riptropin UK | Buy Riptropin UK

  35. Somatropin is effectively used for the treatment of the various medical complications such as growth failure, growth hormone deficiency, intestinal disorder or HIV related weight loss or waste.
    Somatropin | Somatropin UK | Buy Somatropin UK

  36. Buy Zopiclone Sleeping Tablets & Pills securely and discreetly without a prescription at Sleeping Pills Direct. Our prices on Zopiclone Sleeping Pills are cheap.
    Zopiclone | Buy Zopiclone Online | Zopiclone 7.5 mg

  37. Ambien is orally ingested and comes in the form of a pill. As its fast acting, it is recommended you swallow a pill before having a meal and jumping into bed.
    Ambien | Ambien UK | Buy Ambien UK

  38. Valium affects the chemicals in your brain that can become unbalanced and cause anxiety. Valium is used to treat muscle spasms, alcohol withdrawal symptoms and anxiety disorders.
    Valium | Buy Valium Online | Buy Valium Online UK

  39. Xanax is an alprazolam medication recommended for the treatment of anxiety disorders and panic disorders. It belongs to the benzodiazepines group of medications.
    Xanax | Xanax UK | Buy Xanax UK

  40. Zolpidem sleeping pills are taken once before bedtime. Never take more than the recommended dosage as this can be dangerous, especially when takenwith other drugs.
    zolpidem | buy zolpidem | buy zolpidem uk


  41. Be in control of your tanning, of your sun kissed skin and enjoy the outcome of being able to enjoy the beautiful days ahead, with a method of tanning that truly works, is natural and easily able to be injected into the skin. Melanotan 2 uk provides those effects for anyone out there that wants to stop wasting their time in the sun or in the tanning bed and grab life to the fullest.

    The best part? If you do not want to worry about having to inject the peptides, you have the option of using the nasal spray instead. This is a way that everyone out there is able to get the tanning effects they want in half the time that they normally would be able to get them.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan 2 uk | Buy Melanotan 2 uk

  42. When the time comes to find out what Kamagra can do for you, you have to evaluate your unique situation and then determine if this is the best route of action for you to take in the end when you want to fix your problem.

    If you’re suffering from a disease that is keeping you down and out about yourself, then yes Kamagra can help you with not only the problem but with your self esteem, as well! When ED problems start to arise, many men feel like they lose themselves because this is a part of who they are and this is not something that should be happening to them in the end. This is understandable, and you’re not alone. Through the use of Kamagra, so many men were able to find themselves once again and be able to make love, have some fun and let loose without having to worry about the problem showing up again when the time came to perform.

    Through the use of Kamagra, many men found that they also excelled not only in the bedroom, but in their everyday lives. They could stop worrying about this or that, they could fully enjoy everything that came from being alive and having the most fun when the time came. Buy Kamagra is what all the men out there are talking about, what they are providing you with and what you can ensure to get from them without having to worry about anything else.
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra UK | Cheap Kamagra UK

  43. This is a big thing to think about when the time comes. Through the use of this little pill of magic known as Kamagra uk , you can ensure that you have it all and much, much more. Take the time to look into everything that is out there. Never have to worry about this problem again when you’re with a special someone. With minimal side effects that you have to worry about, you can move forward with someone that is really going to stand out and is really going to make the most of what is out there. Now is the time to check out what we are offering, now is the time to make the decision to move forward and get what you want, when you want it. You have the power, the self esteem and everything else you want when the time comes.

    Now it is time to consider the Kamagra pills that you can purchase and make the most of what it out there when the time comes. Get it today and start seeing the effects that it has in a matter of minutes!
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra UK | Cheap Kamagra UK

  44. Testimony On How My Life was Transform through the help of a God-sent Lender.

    Hello everyone, I am Kathie Roper by name, am writing this Testimony because am really grateful for what Mason Diego did for me and my family, when I thought there was no hope he came and make my family feel alive again by lending us loan at a very low interest rate of 2%. Well I have been searching for a loan to settle my debts for the past three months all I met scammed and took my money until I finally met a God sent Lender. I never thought that there are still genuine loan lenders on the internet but to my greatest surprise i got my loan without wasting much time so if you are out there looking for a loan of any amount i would advise you to email Mr Diego via email: { } and be free of internet scams. thanks... Kathie Roper from California, USA.

  45. Hello, an amazing Information dude. Thanks for sharing this nice information with us. Kamagra

  46. Thank you for sharing such an informative post.

    Apcalis Oral Jelly is the most recommended tablet to cure erectile dysfunction in men. It is available at low prices on various online erectile dysfunction pharmacy. You should buy Apcalis Oral Jelly from trustworthy shops as Wide Pharmacy.

  47. Thank you for sharing such an informative post.

    Kamagra Oral Jelly is the most recommended tablet to cure erectile dysfunction in men. It is available at low prices on various online erectile dysfunction pharmacy. You should buy Kamagra Oral Jelly from trustworthy shops as Wide Pharmacy.

  48. Thanks for providing good information,Thanks for your sharing.
    SA Gaming
    SA Gaming78
    SA Gaming78 online


Commenting policy:

All comments are welcome here. I refuse to censor points of view that differ from my own.

I recognize that I may be challenging the deep-seated beliefs of some people, and perhaps stirring up emotions in others. However, I would ask:

- if you care to respond to anything that I have said, please do not simply link to or quote some statistic. Do not simply regurgitate things you have been told are true. Think about what I am saying. Respond with an argument. Offer something from your personal observations, and explain to me how you feel your statistic is connected to your experience.

- If you wish to be part of a discussion, try not to dismiss what I or a another commenter says out of hand. Yes, that means that some lines of thought or ideologies may not stand up to scrutiny (perhaps even my own).

- Remember, ad hominem attacks diminish everyone involved. If you want to criticize anything, do so passionately and directly - but debate is about attacking ideas, not people.

Have at you!